Bloomberg Law
INSIGHT: Rule 23(b)(1)(B): A Mechanism to Avoid A Famine or Means to Achieve an Undeserved Feast?
July 30, 2018
Two Sidley lawyers examine Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and how courts have treated the plaintiff requests in putative consumer class actions to apply the rule where limited funds—or claims of limited funds—are noticeably absent from the proceedings.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Maintains a Strong Presence at the 2026 Consumer Brands CPG Legal ForumWednesday, February 18, 2026 - Friday, February 20, 2026Trend Watch 2026: Hot Topics in California Regulation and LitigationTuesday, February 10, 2026U.S. FTC Signals Renewed Interest in “Click-to-Cancel” RulemakingFebruary 9, 2026Sidley Grows San Diego Office With Leading Class Actions Partner Michelle DoolinFebruary 6, 2026Sidley Represents RoundTable Healthcare Partners in Its Partnership and Investment in ColorescienceFebruary 2, 2026Anderson v. Intel – U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari: Implications for ERISA “Excessive Fee” LitigationJanuary 26, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
