Inside Counsel
Is your industry under fire? Targeting entire industries through enterprise liability
June 3, 2015
For decades, basic tort principles have required product liability plaintiffs to prove a causal link between their injuries and an individual defendant’s conduct. Minor exceptions for alternative liability, enterprise liability and market share liability (in a minority of states) have left these bedrock principles largely unchanged. However, recent developments lessening plaintiffs’ burdens of proof regarding causation and liability are rendering more defendants responsible for the conduct of others. Listed below are theories under which plaintiffs have attempted to expand liability, the industries impacted, and the mixed results with which plaintiffs’ efforts have been met.
This article originally appeared in Inside Counsel, June 3, 2015.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
First Chair Trial and Leading Product Liability Lawyer Paul Boehm Joins Sidley as Partner in D.C. to Expand Product Liability and Mass Torts Litigation PracticeDecember 18, 2025Michelle Ramirez to Chair Panel Discussion on Global Product Liability Claims at GLG’s 2025 Global Class Action Symposium in LondonTuesday, November 18, 2025 – Wednesday, November 19, 2025Sidley Wins D.C. Products Liability “Litigation Department of the Year” at the National Law Journal Awards 2025November 6, 2025Sidley’s Litigation Strength Recognized in Benchmark Litigation 2026October 31, 2025Sidley’s Global Life Sciences Practice Recognized in LMG Life Sciences 2025October 1, 2025And Now A Word From The Panel: Choosing MDL VenuesSeptember 25, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
