Corporate Counsel
Food for Thought (and Litigation): FDA Thinks About Defining ‘Natural’
January 20, 2016
For years, many have asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to define the term “natural” for use in food labeling. Private citizens asked. Corporations asked. Even federal courts asked. But until recently, aside from an attempt at rulemaking in the early 1990s (an attempt that the FDA formally abandoned in 1993), the FDA had taken no steps to formally define the term. Rather, the FDA relied upon its policy regarding the use of “natural” as meaning that nothing artificial or synthetic (including all color additives, regardless of source) has been included in, or has been added to, a food.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Washington Supreme Court Rejects Meta Pixel Claims: A Significant but Narrow Win for BusinessesOctober 22, 2026Three Sidley Partners Recognized as 2026 “Consumer Goods Business Visionaries”October 20, 20262026 Momentum Food and Beverage ExchangeOctober 6-7, 202622 Sidley Lawyers Named to 2027 Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in AmericaSeptember 11, 2026Personalized Pricing: The FTC's Newest Enforcement PrioritySeptember 3, 2026Eight Sidley Lawyers Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 “Top 250 Women in Litigation” ListAugust 14, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
