BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Ninth Circuit Rejects $8.5M Award Of Attorneys’ Fees to FCA WhistleblowerApril 14, 2026DOJ Announces First FCA Settlement Resolving Title VII Discrimination AllegationsApril 13, 2026White House and DOJ Announce Sweeping New Anti-Fraud InitiativesApril 10, 2026Ninth Circuit Opens Door to FCA Liability for Alleged 340B OverchargesMarch 19, 2026Fourth Circuit Highlights Tougher Path to Dismissal of FCA Cases Post-SuperValuMarch 18, 2026Fifth Circuit Panel Produces Three Opinions Wrestling with Application of First to File BarMarch 13, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

