Law360
We Need A New Test For Anonymous Internet Speech
December 7, 2015
The question of when the right to speak anonymously should give way to the right to preserve reputation recently made the news when actor James Woods, a caustic tweeter himself, sought an order requiring Twitter to disclose the identity of two anonymous Twitter users whom Woods sued after they tweeted he was a “cocaine addict” and “registered sex offender.” Whether Woods will be entitled to unmask his nemeses is yet to be definitively decided because the defendants have filed a special motion to strike Woods’ complaint pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, thus halting all discovery. Consequently, at least for the moment, the court denied Woods’ attempt to disclose the identity of the defendants.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
22 Sidley Lawyers Named to 2027 Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in AmericaSeptember 11, 2026Texas Court Holds Nonoperating Lessee Owes Royalty on Co-Tenant’s Wells Before It Sees a Dime — Plus Attorney’s Fees for LatenessSeptember 8, 2026Personalized Pricing: The FTC's Newest Enforcement PrioritySeptember 3, 2026Sidley Represents Apollo Funds in US$4.1 Billion Sale of Kelvion to SLBSeptember 1, 2026Sidley Represents Mubadala Capital in Its Acquisition of Arrive LogisticsAugust 28, 2026A Purchase-Price Adjustment Is Not the End of the Road with Indemnification on the TableAugust 24, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory