Law360
We Need A New Test For Anonymous Internet Speech
December 7, 2015
The question of when the right to speak anonymously should give way to the right to preserve reputation recently made the news when actor James Woods, a caustic tweeter himself, sought an order requiring Twitter to disclose the identity of two anonymous Twitter users whom Woods sued after they tweeted he was a “cocaine addict” and “registered sex offender.” Whether Woods will be entitled to unmask his nemeses is yet to be definitively decided because the defendants have filed a special motion to strike Woods’ complaint pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, thus halting all discovery. Consequently, at least for the moment, the court denied Woods’ attempt to disclose the identity of the defendants.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Rollin Ransom and Matthew Thompson Named 2026 “Entertainment Visionaries” by the Los Angeles TimesJune 16, 2026Florida Driver Ruling Shows Renewed Focus On Privacy StandingJune 11, 2026Fraud Strategy Shifts the Burden Upstream – and Banks Are in the Firing LineJune 9, 2026Sidley Secures Third Major Victory for City of Pasadena and Rose Bowl Operating Company in UCLA Stadium DisputeJune 8, 2026When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY DecisionJune 4, 2026Sidley Highly Ranked in Chambers USA 2026June 4, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory