Law360
We Need A New Test For Anonymous Internet Speech
December 7, 2015
The question of when the right to speak anonymously should give way to the right to preserve reputation recently made the news when actor James Woods, a caustic tweeter himself, sought an order requiring Twitter to disclose the identity of two anonymous Twitter users whom Woods sued after they tweeted he was a “cocaine addict” and “registered sex offender.” Whether Woods will be entitled to unmask his nemeses is yet to be definitively decided because the defendants have filed a special motion to strike Woods’ complaint pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, thus halting all discovery. Consequently, at least for the moment, the court denied Woods’ attempt to disclose the identity of the defendants.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Notable Cases and Events in eDiscoveryMarch 6, 202611th Circ. NextEra Ruling Broadens Loss Causation StandardMarch 3, 2026Superpowers — and Potential Perils: Deploying AI for BusinessMarch 2026Generative AI and Privilege: Practical Lessons from Two Early Decisions and What Comes NextFebruary 27, 2026Sidley Represents The Brink’s Company in US$6.6 Billion Acquisition of NCR AtleosFebruary 26, 2026Sidley Represents Arsenal Capital Partners and MaxHealth in Sale of MaxHealth to CenterWellFebruary 17, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory