Law360
We Need A New Test For Anonymous Internet Speech
December 7, 2015
The question of when the right to speak anonymously should give way to the right to preserve reputation recently made the news when actor James Woods, a caustic tweeter himself, sought an order requiring Twitter to disclose the identity of two anonymous Twitter users whom Woods sued after they tweeted he was a “cocaine addict” and “registered sex offender.” Whether Woods will be entitled to unmask his nemeses is yet to be definitively decided because the defendants have filed a special motion to strike Woods’ complaint pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, thus halting all discovery. Consequently, at least for the moment, the court denied Woods’ attempt to disclose the identity of the defendants.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
U.S. Department of Justice Announces Major Justice Manual Revisions on Sub-Regulatory Guidance and Dismissals of False Claims Act Qui TamsSeptember 21, 2026Sidley Secures US$640 Million Settlement for Genesis Healthcare Special Restructuring Committee Following High-Stakes Bankruptcy LitigationSeptember 18, 2026When the Meeting Minutes and the AI Transcript Don’t Match: Litigation Insights From Delaware ChancerySeptember 17, 2026Sidley Represents Vi-Jon in Chapter 11 CaseSeptember 14, 202622 Sidley Lawyers Named to 2027 Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in AmericaSeptember 11, 2026Turnarounds & Workouts Recognizes Sidley Among Leading U.S. Law Firms for Asia-Pacific RestructuringSeptember 10, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory