Law360
We Need A New Test For Anonymous Internet Speech
December 7, 2015
The question of when the right to speak anonymously should give way to the right to preserve reputation recently made the news when actor James Woods, a caustic tweeter himself, sought an order requiring Twitter to disclose the identity of two anonymous Twitter users whom Woods sued after they tweeted he was a “cocaine addict” and “registered sex offender.” Whether Woods will be entitled to unmask his nemeses is yet to be definitively decided because the defendants have filed a special motion to strike Woods’ complaint pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, thus halting all discovery. Consequently, at least for the moment, the court denied Woods’ attempt to disclose the identity of the defendants.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Elects New Partnership Class of 52June 1, 2026Sidley Secures Published California Court of Appeal Decision on Unsettled Question of Trade Secret LawJune 1, 2026Update on English Legal Advice Privilege Following the Aabar Holdings v Glencore JudgmentMay 20, 2026Sidley Advises Big 12 Conference on Partnership With RedBird Capital PartnersMay 15, 2026盛德斩获2026年《金融时报》亚太创新律师大奖May 14, 2026Sidley Represents Rigel Pharmaceuticals in Exclusive Global License Agreement with Pfizer and Arvinas for VEPPANUMay 13, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory