Law360
We Need A New Test For Anonymous Internet Speech
December 7, 2015
The question of when the right to speak anonymously should give way to the right to preserve reputation recently made the news when actor James Woods, a caustic tweeter himself, sought an order requiring Twitter to disclose the identity of two anonymous Twitter users whom Woods sued after they tweeted he was a “cocaine addict” and “registered sex offender.” Whether Woods will be entitled to unmask his nemeses is yet to be definitively decided because the defendants have filed a special motion to strike Woods’ complaint pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, thus halting all discovery. Consequently, at least for the moment, the court denied Woods’ attempt to disclose the identity of the defendants.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Nineteen Sidley Lawyers Named Finalists for the Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2026April 2, 2026Sidley's Private Funds & Asset Management 2026: Private Equity Fees – Scrutiny Is Rising, Be PreparedMarch 2026U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Contributory Copyright LiabilityMarch 27, 2026Maryland District Court Relies on Loper Bright to Hold Written Consent for Telemarketing Calls Not RequiredMarch 27, 2026Sidley Represents Salt & Stone in Majority Stake Acquisition by AdventMarch 24, 2026Fifth Circuit Holds U.S. FTC’s In-House Adjudication of Deceptive Advertising Claim Unconstitutional Under JarkesyMarch 24, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory