Securities Enforcement and Regulatory Update
FINRA Issues 2026 Regulatory Oversight Report

On December 9, 2025, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) released its 2026 Annual Regulatory Oversight Report (2026 Report). The nearly 90-page report highlights emerging risks — including cybersecurity, data privacy, and generative AI (GenAI) — and offers tools and best practices for member firms. It also reemphasizes the perennial focus areas of Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) compliance, third-party vendor management, best execution, consolidated audit trail (CAT), and compliance with the financial responsibility rules. Below are key takeaways, followed by a deeper dive into notable areas of focus, for some of the topics most relevant for broker-dealers.
Takeaways
FINRA has emphasized that the 2026 Report was released early in response to feedback from member firms. It is important to keep in mind that FINRA considers its oversight reports to be guidance that firms should review to assess how FINRA interprets its rules and assess member firm compliance with those rules. In particular, the 2026 Report reflects the following important takeaways:
- New technologies bring about new risks, and corporate governance and supervision frameworks need to keep pace.
- Cybersecurity must be prioritized.
- Anti-money-laundering (AML) testing, including evaluation of customer due diligence processes, remain a focus.
- Everything old is new again: Manipulative trading, vendor management; communications and sales; and best execution are evergreen topics for compliance review.
- Certain FINRA rules apply to the activities of firms and their associated persons irrespective of whether the activity involves a security (e.g., crypto).
- Firms must stay on top of changes to financial management and reporting rules and the application of these rules to newer asset or product types, such as crypto.
Notable Areas of Focus
GenAI: Continuing and Emerging Trends
In this newly added section of the 2026 Report, FINRA highlights that it expects firms to assess regulatory compliance obligations before deploying GenAI and to establish governance frameworks to supervise GenAI usage. FINRA offers the following:
- Controls should address hallucinations, bias, cybersecurity risks, and threat-actor use of AI.
- Ongoing human monitoring of model outputs is essential.
- Autonomous AI agents may require novel oversight, including tracking actions and restricting system access.
Financial Crimes Prevention
Cybersecurity and Cyber-Enabled Fraud
FINRA emphasizes that cybersecurity remains a core operational and compliance risk. Firms are expected to maintain robust cybersecurity programs aligned with applicable SEC and FINRA rules, including safeguards for customer information and identity theft prevention. Recent SEC amendments to Regulation S-P require policies to detect, respond to, and recover from unauthorized access to customer data. FINRA identified several key threats targeting both broker-dealers and their customers:
- ransomware and extortion attacks that compromise firm systems and hold data for ransom
- data breaches exposing confidential firm and customer information
- social engineering (phishing, smishing, QR-code “quishing”) leveraging deceptive messages to capture credentials
- new account fraud and account takeovers via stolen or falsified identity information
- imposter sites and social accounts spoofing firms or regulators to defraud investors
- insider threats from employees misusing access
- GenAI-enabled fraud, with threat actors using AI to produce deepfakes, fake IDs, polymorphic malware, and other tools that enable sophisticated cybercrimes
Anti-Money Laundering, Fraud, and Sanctions
- As in prior years, FINRA outlines the expectation that firms will incorporate affirmative practices to detect and mitigate external attempts to defraud the firms’ customers. These practices include, among others, designing risk-based compliance programs to identify red flags of external fraud, educating associated persons and customers on how scams occur, and developing response plans for use if a firm determines a customer has been victimized.
- Firms should review whether their written supervisory procedures (WSPs) clearly delegate AML-related responsibilities to business units or individuals best positioned to identify potentially suspicious activity. Further, firms should arrange independent AML compliance testing and schedule periodic assessments of alerts and exception reports to confirm proper functioning.
Manipulative Trading
- The prevention and detection of manipulative trading is an evergreen focus for FINRA. In the 2026 Report, in addition to reemphasizing points from prior years’ reports, FINRA calls out concerns about small-cap fraud in exchange listed equities. This particular area has been a prior focus of regulatory guidance and in 2025 became the subject of a now-ongoing targeted examination.
- The report also notes concerns about non-bona-fide trading, front running, and prearranged trading and surveillance for those activities.
- The report highlights findings related to market manipulation surveillance deficiencies, including:
- failing to implement surveillance systems capable of detecting a range of manipulative trading schemes (e.g., spoofing, layering, wash trades, prearranged trades, marking the close)
- poorly designed surveillance thresholds and controls — set improperly, not tailored to relevant securities or account types, or not inclusive of both customer and proprietary activity
- failing to periodically reassess surveillance parameters as their business, customer base, or market conditions change
- failing to review customer activity for broader patterns of potential manipulation across time periods, customers, or related alerts
- delaying review of surveillance alerts, lack of adequate staffing or training to evaluate them, or failing to document review findings
Firm Operations — Vendor Management Is Front and Center
- FINRA expects firms to maintain a supervisory system — including written supervisory procedures — that effectively oversees outsourced activities and supports compliance with securities laws, FINRA rules, and Regulation S-P. Firms using or considering third-party vendors should evaluate whether their controls sufficiently supervise outsourced functions, including those subject to Rules 1220, 3110, and 4370. FINRA also notes a rise in cyberattacks and outages involving third-party providers, warning that such incidents can disrupt multiple firms due to industrywide reliance on vendors. FINRA continues to monitor these third-party risks closely.
- When discussing effective practices for vendor management, FINRA notes that firms should conduct thorough initial and ongoing due diligence of third-party vendors supporting critical functions — particularly IT, cybersecurity, and AML — by evaluating vendors’ use of GenAI, confirming that contracts protect sensitive data, and confirming adequate data-protection controls. Firms should maintain inventories of all vendor-provided systems, software versions, and the firm data vendors access or store. They should assess the potential impact of vendor cyber incidents, monitor vendors for vulnerabilities or breaches, and implement strong vendor risk management policies, including risk assessments, contingency plans, and incident-response testing that involves vendors. Firms must also manage contract termination obligations by confirming that firm data is returned or destroyed, revoking vendor access promptly, and evaluating risks posed by any fourth-party providers.
- The report also identifies effective practices for technology management, which is increasingly the focus of examinations and enforcement investigations:
- Governance: Establish a technology governance framework with clear accountability, oversight, and documented processes (including change, incident, and problem management) in WSPs.
- Risk assessments: Regularly reassess the firm’s technology risk profile as business and systems evolve and update IT governance accordingly.
- AI/LLMs: Implement governance or model-risk frameworks for AI/LLM development and use, with strong documentation and data management controls (quality, integrity, retention, security).
- Identity access management: Enforce least-privilege access, require multifactor authentication, and perform comprehensive access reviews for human and nonhuman accounts.
- Data backups: Perform regular encrypted, off-network backups and test restoration capabilities.
- Branch office procedures: Limit branch-managed servers; if permitted, confirm that devices and applications are fully inventoried.
- Configuration management: Inventory and properly configure desktops, laptops, applications, and servers to firm standards.
- Cloud adoption: Plan and design cloud-migration processes to facilitate readiness and compliance.
- Log management: Capture and retain log data from relevant sources based on regulatory and business needs.
- IT resiliency: Test both firm and vendor controls to confirm that critical systems can maintain acceptable service levels during disruptions.
Crypto — Still a Focus for FINRA
- In contrast to the SEC’s recent examination priorities report, which dropped any mention of crypto issues, digital assets remain an examination focus for FINRA.
- FINRA reiterates much of the material in last year’s report related to crypto and continues to encourage member firms to actively monitor and respond to market, legislative, and policy developments in the digital asset space. The report cites to many of the recent SEC developments and guidance that firms need to consider in light of the new regulatory environment.
- Firms should conduct due diligence of unregistered offerings of investment contracts involving cryptoassets and understand information including the unregistered offering’s registration exemption, risk factors, and conflicts of interest disclosed in offering documents or promotional materials, the identities of the initial development team, the total supply of underlying cryptoassets and other tokenomics, relevant token and smart contract functionality, and cybersecurity risks to the token’s blockchain protocol.
- Firms should conduct risk-based, on-chain fraud and AML reviews when firms or their associated persons accept, trade, or transfer cryptoassets and should create procedures addressing performance and documentation of these reviews.
- Firms should take steps to inform customers about the differences between their brokerage account and any affiliated crypto account, including differences in Securities Investor Protection Corporation protections, regulatory oversight, firm supervision, and avenues for customer questions or complaints.
Communications and Sales
Communications With the Public
FINRA continues to focus on risks presented by social media and reminds firms to monitor new communication channels, apps, and features; develop procedures and controls for live-streamed public appearances, presentations, or video blogs; and clearly define permissible and prohibited digital communications channels.
Reg BI, Form CRS, and Private Placements
FINRA continues to focus on compliance with all aspects of Reg BI; among other best practices, FINRA reminds firms to appropriately train associated persons on the features of complex or risky products, implement system enhancements to maintain a clear record for delivery of Form CRS and Reg BI-related documents to customers, and incorporate Reg BI-specific reviews into branch exams.
Private Placements
The report highlights that some firms have failed to conduct reasonable due diligence prior to recommending private placements to retail investors, including by failing to conduct sufficient research on an issuer’s business (particularly in instances where there is a lack of operating history), relying solely on the firm’s past experience with and knowledge of an issuer, and failing to conduct a reasonable investigation of “covered persons” involved in the issuer under Reg D.
Market Integrity
FINRA continues to identify CAT, best execution and order routing disclosures, fixed income fair pricing, extended hours trading, and compliance with the market access rule as areas of importance. Key findings and observations are as follows:
Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT)
- FINRA highlights for firms the SEC’s February 2025 exemptive relief related to the reporting of certain customer information to the Customer and Account Information System (CAIS) and a pending amendment to the CAT National Market System Plan that would eliminate certain CAIS reporting requirements related to customer information. FINRA advises firms to remain apprised of any additional changes proposed to CAT.
- FINRA noted several findings in its examinations of CAT compliance, including the incomplete submission of reportable events, failure to timely repair errors, failure to submit corrections, and inaccurate reporting, among other observations.
- FINRA reminds firms that effective practices related to CAT reporting responsibilities include mapping internal records to reported data, establishing a reasonable supervisory process for appropriately secure customer and account information reporting, and self-reporting if a firm discovers CAT reporting issues.
Customer Order Handling: Best Execution and Order Routing Disclosures
- Best execution and Rule 606 disclosures remain a perennial focus at FINRA, which continues to aggressively investigate these issues as an area of programmatic importance in enforcement.
- Notable findings in the 2026 Report include failing to assess execution quality in competing markets. Indeed, numerous enforcement investigations and publicly announced cases reflect alleged deficiencies in this area. FINRA continues to highlight its concerns about firms’ implementing unreasonable “regular and rigorous” reviews and failing to conduct reviews on an order-type basis, among other issues.
- FINRA continues to observe firms publishing inaccurate or incomplete quarterly 606 reports and has recently issued several formal enforcement actions focusing on this issue.
Financial Management
Net Capital
- FINRA reports continuing net capital compliance deficiencies, including improper revenue/expense accruals, weak processes/supervision for net capital deductions, and inadequate monitoring of moment-to-moment net capital and open contractual commitment (OCC) capital charges on firm underwriting commitments.
- FINRA focused on firms’ ability to demonstrate compliance with OCC charges, including understanding if/when a charge applies and maintaining it through settlement.
- Firms should regularly reassess asset classifications and confirm that revenue-recognition policies are well documented and consistently applied.
- FINRA reiterates previously issued guidance but places explicit emphasis on moment-to-moment capital compliance, including clearly defining the firm’s underwriting role in the underwriting or purchase agreements; establishing processes to track OCCs and apply charges accurately; and maintaining records evidencing when an OCC may be extinguished and the related charge discontinued.
- The SEC’s May 2025 Crypto FAQs address capital charge requirements for proprietary spot bitcoin or ether positions arising from a firm’s facilitating in-kind creations and redemptions of exchange-traded products that invest in spot bitcoin or ether.
Liquidity Risk Management
- FINRA continues to emphasize liquidity and funding risk management as fundamental and has identified weaknesses in firms’ liquidity frameworks, including inaccurate/incomplete Supplemental Liquidity Schedule reporting, such as misreported counterparties and incomplete noncash securities lending data.
- Firms should maintain and update liquidity management practices aligned with current business activities, including liquidity management plans with idiosyncratic and marketwide stress assumptions, stress testing aligned to the risk profile of the firm’s business models, and strong data governance frameworks to support the accuracy/completeness of stress-testing and source data.
Protection of Customer Assets
- The SEC extended the compliance date for firms required as of December 31, 2025, to compute their reserve formula daily under new SEC Rule 15c3-3(e)(3)(i)(B)(1) to June 30, 2026, and permits other firms to elect daily computation with 30 days’ prior notice to their examining authority. Related amendments allow firms using the alternative standard of the Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1(a)(1)(ii)) to decrease aggregate debit items in the computation of the firm’s reserve requirement from 3% to 2%.
- Firms should periodically review reserve formula computation adjustments for accuracy and compliance with the Customer Protection Rule and confirm that qualified and appropriately registered personnel perform/supervise reserve-formula computations and possession-or-control processes.
- The SEC Crypto FAQs clarify that non-special-purpose digital asset broker-dealers may hold customer digital assets in any location qualifying as a “good control location” under Rule 15c3-3 (generally, a bank in accordance with Rule 15c3-3(c)(5)), and firms must maintain documentation evidencing such locations.
- Firms exempt under Rule 15c3-3(k)(2)(ii) must maintain and periodically review checks-received and checks-forwarded blotters to demonstrate compliance with the exemption, including confirming that they “promptly transmit” customer checks payable to the clearing broker-dealer.
Attorney Advertising—Sidley Austin LLP is a global law firm. Our addresses and contact information can be found at www.sidley.com/en/locations/offices.
Sidley provides this information as a service to clients and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking advice from professional advisers. Sidley and Sidley Austin refer to Sidley Austin LLP and affiliated partnerships as explained at www.sidley.com/disclaimer.
© Sidley Austin LLP
Contacts
Offices
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory





