Law360
A New Precedent For ERISA Denial-Of-Benefits Rewards
January 23, 2014
On Dec. 6, 2013, a divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a plaintiff challenging a denial-of-benefits decision can recover both the denied benefits and disgorgement of any profits made on that amount. See Rochow v. Life Insurance Co. of North America, No. 12-2074 (6th Cir. Dec. 6, 2013). By providing what appears to be a dual award for the same injury, the majority’s decision represents a dramatic departure from existing precedent precluding such awards. A dissenting opinion made exactly this point, noting that the majority opinion represents “an unprecedented and extraordinary step to expand the scope of ERISA coverage.”
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Represents Olive & June in Its US$240 Million Sale to Helen of TroyNovember 21, 2024Sidley Represents Tengram Capital Partners in Its Sale of HRB BrandsOctober 7, 2024Sidley’s Litigation Capabilities Highly Commended in Benchmark Litigation 2025October 4, 2024Sidley Represents Carlyle and KKR in Its Agreement to Acquire a US$10.1 Billion Portfolio of Prime Private Student Loans From DiscoverJuly 17, 2024U.S. District Court Issues First Ruling on ERISA Claims Challenging Use of 401(k) Plan ForfeituresMay 28, 2024Sidley Represents Carlin Consumer Health in Its Acquisition of PenetrexMay 6, 2024
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory