Law360
A New Precedent For ERISA Denial-Of-Benefits Rewards
January 23, 2014
On Dec. 6, 2013, a divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a plaintiff challenging a denial-of-benefits decision can recover both the denied benefits and disgorgement of any profits made on that amount. See Rochow v. Life Insurance Co. of North America, No. 12-2074 (6th Cir. Dec. 6, 2013). By providing what appears to be a dual award for the same injury, the majority’s decision represents a dramatic departure from existing precedent precluding such awards. A dissenting opinion made exactly this point, noting that the majority opinion represents “an unprecedented and extraordinary step to expand the scope of ERISA coverage.”
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Out With the New, In With the Old: The “Five-Part Test” Rides AgainMarch 30, 2026Anderson v. Intel – U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari: Implications for ERISA “Excessive Fee” LitigationSpring 202611th Circ. NextEra Ruling Broadens Loss Causation StandardMarch 3, 2026Generative AI and Privilege: Practical Lessons from Two Early Decisions and What Comes NextFebruary 27, 2026Anderson v. Intel – U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari: Implications for ERISA “Excessive Fee” LitigationJanuary 26, 2026Sidley Represents Olive & June in Its US$240 Million Sale to Helen of TroyNovember 21, 2024
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory