Law360
Takeaways From Doc Dispute In Armstrong FCA Litigation
August 6, 2015
In the ongoing Lance Armstrong doping allegations saga, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently issued an order upholding the applicability of the attorney-client privilege to relator Floyd Landis’ quest for documents in his False Claims Act case. The court found that Armstrong’s former racing teammate had not met his burden in proving the inapplicability of the attorney-client privilege and, therefore, Landis cannot obtain privileged documents from nonparty Williams & Connolly LLP, which formerly represented Armstrong.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
False Claims Act Risk on the RadarTuesday, October 6, 2026Eleventh Circuit Rejects Appointments Clause Challenge to Qui Tam MechanismSeptember 2, 2026New York Ethics Opinion Warns Lawyers on Qui Tam DeceptionSeptember 2, 2026DOJ Continues Medicare Advantage Enforcement Focus with $541.5 Million SettlementAugust 31, 2026DOJ Announces Second Settlement Resolving FCA Allegations Based on Employment DiscriminationAugust 28, 2026Second Circuit Clarifies Scope of “Property” that an FCA “Claim” May SeekAugust 17, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
