Law360
Takeaways From Doc Dispute In Armstrong FCA Litigation
August 6, 2015
In the ongoing Lance Armstrong doping allegations saga, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently issued an order upholding the applicability of the attorney-client privilege to relator Floyd Landis’ quest for documents in his False Claims Act case. The court found that Armstrong’s former racing teammate had not met his burden in proving the inapplicability of the attorney-client privilege and, therefore, Landis cannot obtain privileged documents from nonparty Williams & Connolly LLP, which formerly represented Armstrong.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
District of Massachusetts Rejects Per Se AKS Liability for Commissioned, Independent Contractor Sales Representatives But Allows FCA Claims to ProceedOctober 26, 2026DOJ Launches Criminal and Civil Self-Disclosure Programs Relevant to Healthcare and Life Sciences CompaniesOctober 26, 2026DOJ and HHS Launch Healthcare FCA Self-Disclosure Pilot Program with Fixed Repayment MultiplierOctober 22, 2026HHS Secretary Extends HHS-OIG Exclusion Authority to CMS, Expanding the Administration's Anti-Fraud CampaignOctober 19, 2026DOJ Fraud Division and HHS-OIG Announce Joint Self-Disclosure Policy, Directing Healthcare Companies to Bring Potential Criminal Matters to DOJ FirstOctober 16, 2026Court Grants Summary Judgment in Kickback-Based FCA Case, Holding Relator Failed to Prove Remuneration or WillfulnessOctober 7, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
