Law360
Takeaways From Doc Dispute In Armstrong FCA Litigation
August 6, 2015
In the ongoing Lance Armstrong doping allegations saga, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently issued an order upholding the applicability of the attorney-client privilege to relator Floyd Landis’ quest for documents in his False Claims Act case. The court found that Armstrong’s former racing teammate had not met his burden in proving the inapplicability of the attorney-client privilege and, therefore, Landis cannot obtain privileged documents from nonparty Williams & Connolly LLP, which formerly represented Armstrong.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
$14.1 Million FCA Settlement Underscores Medicare Advantage Coding ScrutinyAugust 6, 2026New York Ethics Opinion Addresses Ethical Limits on Attorney Participation in Whistleblower InvestigationsJuly 30, 2026Laboratory, Owners, and Investors Settle COVID-19 Testing Fraud Allegations for $24 MillionJuly 27, 2026DOJ Releases FOCUS Questionnaire to Assist in Evaluating Qui Tams Filed by Data MinersJuly 20, 2026June DOJ/SBA FCA Settlement Highlights Continued Focus on Contractor ComplianceJuly 15, 2026Texas Supreme Court Imposes Materiality Requirement on Texas Healthcare Fraud Omissions ClaimsJuly 7, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
