Law360
Takeaways From Doc Dispute In Armstrong FCA Litigation
August 6, 2015
In the ongoing Lance Armstrong doping allegations saga, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently issued an order upholding the applicability of the attorney-client privilege to relator Floyd Landis’ quest for documents in his False Claims Act case. The court found that Armstrong’s former racing teammate had not met his burden in proving the inapplicability of the attorney-client privilege and, therefore, Landis cannot obtain privileged documents from nonparty Williams & Connolly LLP, which formerly represented Armstrong.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Court Grants Summary Judgment in Kickback-Based FCA Case, Holding Relator Failed to Prove Remuneration or WillfulnessOctober 7, 2026False Claims Act Risk on the RadarTuesday, October 6, 2026Court Holds Insurer Must Cover FCA Settlement Despite “Fraudulent Acts” ExclusionOctober 2, 2026DOJ Continues to Prioritize Medicare Advantage Enforcement with $22.5 Million SettlementOctober 1, 2026Texas Medicaid Fraud Decision Leaves 2 Open QuestionsOctober 1, 2026D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office Announces Creation of Standalone Division Focused on False Claims Act EnforcementSeptember 25, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
