Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
When a Whistleblower Complaint Becomes a Board-Level ‘Red Flag
December 19, 2025
In a recent Caremark decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery largely denied a motion to dismiss, holding that most of Regions Bank’s board purportedly ignored red flags raised in a whistleblower report concerning the bank’s unlawful overdraft practices — practices that later led to the company paying US$191 million in penalties and remediation to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The court found a former in-house lawyer’s draft complaint sent to the board was a true red flag, and it held that merely engaging outside counsel to investigate, without timely corrective action, does not automatically defeat an inference of bad faith at the pleadings stage. The opinion underscores that both documented, prompt board-level escalation and timely corrective action are critical as to compliance risks that are central to the business.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
California Appellate Court Affirms Enforceability of Federal Forum Provisions in Securities Act LitigationDecember 17, 2025Sidley Represents ABM In Its US$275 Million Acquisition of WGNSTARDecember 17, 2025Sidley Elects Partnership Class of 29 and Counsel Class of 15 Across Europe and U.S.December 11, 2025Court of Chancery Reaffirms High Bar for Challenging Advance Notice Bylaws, but Emphasizes the Importance of Clear DraftingDecember 10, 2025When a Whistleblower Complaint Becomes a Board-Level “Red Flag”December 3, 2025Board Oversight of AI Risk Through an Ethical LensNovember 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory