ELLEN CRISHAM PELLEGRINI represents clients before law enforcement and regulatory agencies, including the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and has significant experience advising clients regarding the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), economic sanctions, export control investigations, and related matters. A member of the White Collar: Government Litigation & Investigations practice, Ellen has conducted numerous internal investigations throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, Europe, South America, and Africa. She represents a wide variety of clients from across diverse industries, including pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, energy, consumer products, and financial services. In addition to her work on internal and external investigations, Ellen has a robust FCPA compliance counseling practice, and counsels clients on designing and implementing global compliance programs and conducts compliance risk assessments.
In addition, Ellen is a member of the Commercial Litigation and Disputes practice, where she represents plaintiffs and defendants in criminal and civil matters before federal and state courts and administrative tribunals.
Ellen’s current and recent representations include:
- Defending a multinational manufacturer in a BIS investigation involving allegations of fraud in export activities.
- Defending a Fortune 100 company in an OFAC investigation involving Iranian, Sudanese, and Syrian sanctions.
- Defending and obtaining a declination for a multinational public company in an SEC investigation arising from whistleblower allegations of possible FCPA violations in Kazakhstan.
- Defending a Fortune 100 company under investigation by Brazilian law enforcement involving allegations of anti-competitive and corrupt conduct.
- Chevron Mining Inv. v. United States (D. NM). Represent plaintiff Chevron in CERCLA allocation action, seeking apportionment to the United States of a share of clean-up costs relating to an open-pit Molybdenum mine in Questa, New Mexico.
- Ford v. United States (USCIT). Represent Plaintiff in challenge to Customs and Border Protection’s reclassification of Ford Transit Connect vehicles as vehicles principally designed for the transport of goods (dutiable at 25%) rather than vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons (dutiable at 2.5%). Summary judgment awarded in Plaintiff’s favor.