Skip to main content
Sidley Updates

Guidelines Published for Changes to the Singapore Data Privacy Regime

December 2, 2020

On November 20, 2020, the Singapore Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) published a set of draft advisory guidelines (the Advisory Guidelines) to provide clarification on recent amendments to the Personal Data Protection Act (the PDPA Amendments). We have summarized the PDPA Amendments in our previous client UpdateThe Advisory Guidelines address operational details on key amendments, as summarized below.

Mandatory data breach notification (the DBN Obligation)

  • Generally, an organization should assess whether a data breach is notifiable within 30 calendar days once it has credible grounds to believe that a data breach has occurred, or it should be prepared to provide an explanation to the PDPC.
  • Regarding data breaches resulting in significant harm: the Advisory Guidelines1 have prescribed the following classes of personal data that are considered likely to result in significant harm if compromised:

  (i) Individual’s full name or full national ID number in combination with

  • financial information,
  • life/health insurance information,
  • specified medical information,
  • information leading to identification of a vulnerable adult, child, or young person who is the subject of an investigation or relating to court proceedings involving a child and young person, or
  • private key used to authenticate or sign an electronic record or transaction.

   (ii) Individual’s account information in combination with any required biometric data, security code, access code, password, or answer to security question used to permit access to or use of the account where the account can be subsequently misused for fraudulent transactions or to access any information under section (i) above.

  • Regarding data breaches of a significant scale: It is confirmed that breaches affecting 500 or more individuals would meet the criteria for data breach notification.

Expanded scope of deemed consent: notification and opt-out

  • On how companies should determine the reasonable period for individuals to opt out, the Advisory Guidelines provide the following guidance: (i) Where a company interacts with individuals on a regular basis (e.g., via push notifications on a mobile application monthly), the opt-out period should not be shorter than that; (ii) direct communications channels (as opposed to mass communication channels) may justify a shorter opt-out period; (iii) easily accessible opt-out methods (e.g., via email or hyperlink) may justify a shorter opt-out period.
  • Note that consent is deemed to be given only after the opt-out period has lapsed — organizations should ensure that any collection, use, or disclosure of personal data commence after the expiration of the opt-out period.
  • An assessment checklist for Deemed Consent by Notification (Annex B to the Advisory Guidelines)2 is provided for organizations to conduct a risk and impact assessment before they can rely on deemed consent by notification.

NEW consent exceptions

  1. New: “Legitimate interests” exception
    • In identifying the legitimate interests of collecting, using, or disclosing the personal data for a purpose, organizations should be able to articulate what the benefits are and who the beneficiaries are. The identified benefits should not be purely speculative.
    • An assessment checklist for legitimate interest exception (Annex C to the Advisory Guidelines)3 is provided for organizations to conduct a risk and impact assessment before they can rely on this exception.
  2. New: “Business improvements” exception
  • Business insights and predictions generated about a specific individual will be considered personal data if an individual can be identified from that data. Organizations may rely on this new exception to use, without consent, and share such data between group companies for business improvement purposes.
  • While the business improvements exception cannot be relied on for sending direct marketing messages, the usage of existing customers’ personal data for data analytics and market research are considered preparatory activities for marketing purposes and hence are permitted.

Once the amendments come into effect, the Advisory Guidelines will be finalized and issued. Apart from the Advisory Guidelines, we await the PDPC to publish regulations to supplement further operational details. By the time the draft regulations are published, it is expected that the amendments would come into force fairly soon.

If you operate in Singapore, handle Singapore data, or maintain a server in Singapore, it is crucial that you have protocols in place to guide employees on what to do when a data breach occurs and consider doing a data breach tabletop exercise. Data privacy policies and procedures need to be reviewed, aligned, and revised as soon as possible to ensure compliance. For more details on what preparations your company should make in view of the PDPA amendments, refer to our previous client Update or reach out to us.



1
Please click here to view the Annex A to the Advisory Guidelines on the PDPAs Enhanced Framework for the Collection Use and Disclosure of Personal Data (November 18, 2020).

2 Please click here to view the Annex B to the Advisory Guidelines on the Assessment Checklist for Deemed Consent by Notification (November 18, 2020).

3Please click here to view the Annex C to the Advisory Guidelines on the Assessment Checklist for Legitimate Interests Exception (November 18, 2020).

弁護士広告—Sidley Austin LLP はグローバルな法律事務所です。当事務所の所在地および連絡先情報は、www.sidley.com/en/locations/offices に掲載されています。

Sidley は、本情報をクライアントおよび関係者の皆様へのサービスとして、教育目的のみに提供しています。本情報は、法的助言として解釈または依拠されるべきものではなく、また弁護士と依頼者の関係を生じさせるものでもありません。読者は、専門家の助言を求めることなく本情報に基づいて行動すべきではありません。Sidley および Sidley Austin とは、www.sidley.com/disclaimer に記載のとおり、Sidley Austin LLP およびその関連パートナーシップを指します。

© Sidley Austin LLP

お問い合わせ

この Sidley Update に関してご質問がある場合は、通常ご担当されている Sidley の弁護士、またはご連絡ください。