University of Chicago Press
Postmortem on NFIB v. Sebelius: Early Reflections on the Decision That Kept the ACA Alive
September 2015
But for one vote by one Justice of the Supreme Court, there would be no reason for any discussion of healthcare under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Chief Justice Roberts’s surprising opinion not only gives life to this symposium, but along with the other opinions by the various Justices serves as a useful context for beginning the process of looking to the future. This essay thus discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius and its implications going forward.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Anderson v. Intel – U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari: Implications for ERISA “Excessive Fee” LitigationJanuary 26, 2026Two Sidley International Arbitration Cases Recognized on Law360’s “5 International Arbitration Cases to Watch in 2026”January 13, 2026Sidley Wins Major Ninth Circuit Antitrust AppealJanuary 13, 2026Sidley Helps Secure Complete Victory in Precedent-Setting Antitrust LitigationDecember 17, 2025Sidley Wins Landmark Ruling: Port Authority No Longer Shielded by Sovereign Immunity in Federal CourtDecember 17, 2025Brussels Dialogues: Law and Policy at the Heart of the EUFriday, December 5, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
