University of Chicago Press
Postmortem on NFIB v. Sebelius: Early Reflections on the Decision That Kept the ACA Alive
September 2015
But for one vote by one Justice of the Supreme Court, there would be no reason for any discussion of healthcare under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Chief Justice Roberts’s surprising opinion not only gives life to this symposium, but along with the other opinions by the various Justices serves as a useful context for beginning the process of looking to the future. This essay thus discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius and its implications going forward.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Brussels Dialogues: Law and Policy at the Heart of the EUFriday, December 5, 2025Energy Policy in Motion: What DOE Section 403 Instruction to FERC Means for Data Center Power SupplyNovember 5, 2025SCOTUS in Session: Tariffs, the “Shadow Docket,” and Executive PowerNovember 2025Sidley’s Litigation Strength Recognized in Benchmark Litigation 2026October 31, 2025Energy Policy in Motion: What DOE Section 403 Instruction to FERC Means for Data Center Power SupplyThursday, October 30, 2025Sidley Recognized by the National Law Journal Awards 2025September 5, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

