University of Chicago Press
Postmortem on NFIB v. Sebelius: Early Reflections on the Decision That Kept the ACA Alive
September 2015
But for one vote by one Justice of the Supreme Court, there would be no reason for any discussion of healthcare under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Chief Justice Roberts’s surprising opinion not only gives life to this symposium, but along with the other opinions by the various Justices serves as a useful context for beginning the process of looking to the future. This essay thus discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius and its implications going forward.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Who Gets a Refund? Reverberations From the SCOTUS Tariffs DecisionMarch 25, 2026Fifth Circuit Holds U.S. FTC’s In-House Adjudication of Deceptive Advertising Claim Unconstitutional Under JarkesyMarch 24, 2026Generative AI and Privilege: Practical Lessons from Two Early Decisions and What Comes NextFebruary 27, 2026Sidley Shortlisted at the Managing IP Americas Awards 2026February 13, 2026Sidley Secures Preliminary Injunction Against Oregon Packaging EPR LawFebruary 9, 2026Anderson v. Intel – U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari: Implications for ERISA “Excessive Fee” LitigationJanuary 26, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
