Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Represents Changchun GeneScience (GenSci) Pharmaceuticals in Its Strategic Licensing Agreement With Yarrow Bioscience for First-in-Class Autoimmune Thyroid Disease TherapyDecember 18, 2025Sidley Represents ABM In Its US$275 Million Acquisition of WGNSTARDecember 17, 2025Sidley Elects Partnership Class of 29 and Counsel Class of 15 Across Europe and U.S.December 11, 2025English High Court Finds BHP Liable in Landmark £36 Billion Fundão Dam LitigationDecember 10, 2025Sidley Advises Ancala on Acquisition of U.S. Chemical Infrastructure PortfolioDecember 4, 2025Sidley Represents Jane Street in Investments in Kraken and X-EnergyDecember 3, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
