Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Eric Schwartz to Speak at National Center for State Courts National Forum on Commercial CourtsThursday, November 19, 2026Ethics Evolved: Old Ethics Rules Meet AI and New Tech ToolsWednesday, November 18, 2026The Nonprofit Boardroom: Current Issues, Considerations, and Emerging RisksWednesday, November 4, 2026Washington Supreme Court Rejects Meta Pixel Claims: A Significant but Narrow Win for BusinessesOctober 22, 2026Sidley Represents Strategic Partnership Between Silgan and AIP in US$7.3 Billion Transaction to Create Diversified Global Metal Packaging BusinessOctober 19, 2026Sidley Advised Energy Transfer on US$2.625 Billion Acquisition of Vaquero MidstreamOctober 6, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
