Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Texas Court Holds Nonoperating Lessee Owes Royalty on Co-Tenant’s Wells Before It Sees a Dime — Plus Attorney’s Fees for LatenessSeptember 8, 2026Personalized Pricing: The FTC's Newest Enforcement PrioritySeptember 3, 2026Sidley Represents Apollo Funds in US$4.1 Billion Sale of Kelvion to SLBSeptember 1, 2026Sidley Represents Mubadala Capital in Its Acquisition of Arrive LogisticsAugust 28, 2026A Purchase-Price Adjustment Is Not the End of the Road with Indemnification on the TableAugust 24, 2026Eight Sidley Lawyers Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 “Top 250 Women in Litigation” ListAugust 14, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
