Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
U.S. Department of Justice Announces Major Justice Manual Revisions on Sub-Regulatory Guidance and Dismissals of False Claims Act Qui TamsSeptember 21, 2026Sidley Secures US$640 Million Settlement for Genesis Healthcare Special Restructuring Committee Following High-Stakes Bankruptcy LitigationSeptember 18, 2026When the Meeting Minutes and the AI Transcript Don’t Match: Litigation Insights From Delaware ChancerySeptember 17, 2026Sidley Represents Vi-Jon in Chapter 11 CaseSeptember 14, 202622 Sidley Lawyers Named to 2027 Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in AmericaSeptember 11, 2026Turnarounds & Workouts Recognizes Sidley Among Leading U.S. Law Firms for Asia-Pacific RestructuringSeptember 10, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
