Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Contributory Copyright LiabilityMarch 27, 2026Maryland District Court Relies on Loper Bright to Hold Written Consent for Telemarketing Calls Not RequiredMarch 27, 2026Sidley Represents Salt & Stone in Majority Stake Acquisition by AdventMarch 24, 2026Fifth Circuit Holds U.S. FTC’s In-House Adjudication of Deceptive Advertising Claim Unconstitutional Under JarkesyMarch 24, 2026Sidley Advises Verdane in Its Partnership With SmartboxMarch 12, 2026Sidley Represents Siris in Its Agreement to Acquire a Majority Stake in TAKKIONMarch 10, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
