Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Clinches Victory in HEC AD/CVD InvestigationsJanuary 30, 2026Sidley Represents Glenfarne as Principal Project Counsel on Alaska LNGJanuary 29, 2026Sidley Advises Marathon Asset Management on its up to US$1.6 Billion Sale to CVCJanuary 26, 2026Sidley Advises on Market-Defining Cross-Border India Matters in 2025January 12, 2026New U.S. Executive Order Targets Stock Buybacks, Dividends, and Executive Compensation for Underperforming Defense ContractorsJanuary 9, 2026Sidley Represents Changchun GeneScience (GenSci) Pharmaceuticals in Its Strategic Licensing Agreement With Yarrow Bioscience for First-in-Class Autoimmune Thyroid Disease TherapyDecember 18, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
