Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
A Purchase-Price Adjustment Is Not the End of the Road with Indemnification on the TableAugust 24, 2026Eight Sidley Lawyers Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 “Top 250 Women in Litigation” ListAugust 14, 2026Six Sidley Partners Featured in Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 “40 & Under List”August 11, 2026Sidley Shortlisted at the Benchmark Europe Awards 2026August 7, 2026Sidley Wins Finance “Litigation Department of the Year” and Earns Multiple Honors at the Texas Legal Awards 2026August 5, 2026Sidley Advises Gates Industrial Corporation on Redomiciliation to BermudaJuly 21, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
