Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Represents Arsenal Capital Partners and MaxHealth in Sale of MaxHealth to CenterWellFebruary 17, 2026Sidley Secures Key Early Victory for Pasadena and Rose Bowl Operating Company in UCLA Stadium DisputeFebruary 13, 2026Trend Watch 2026: Hot Topics in California Regulation and LitigationTuesday, February 10, 2026Sidley Secures Preliminary Injunction Against Oregon Packaging EPR LawFebruary 9, 2026Sidley Represents Lead Arranger in US$1 Billion Financing to Navitas and Rockhopper for First-Ever Development of the Falklands Islands Sea Lion FieldFebruary 9, 2026U.S. FTC Signals Renewed Interest in “Click-to-Cancel” RulemakingFebruary 9, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
