Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Don't Touch That Thermostat: Senate Examines Consumer Product Safety Commission Nominees Amid Agency OverhaulsJune 24, 2026Sidley Secures Complete Jury Verdict on All Claims and Cross-Claims After Nine-Week TrialJune 22, 2026Rollin Ransom and Matthew Thompson Named 2026 “Entertainment Visionaries” by the Los Angeles TimesJune 16, 2026Florida Driver Ruling Shows Renewed Focus On Privacy StandingJune 11, 2026Fraud Strategy Shifts the Burden Upstream – and Banks Are in the Firing LineJune 9, 2026Sidley Secures Third Major Victory for City of Pasadena and Rose Bowl Operating Company in UCLA Stadium DisputeJune 8, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
