Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Advises Verdane in Its Partnership With SmartboxMarch 12, 2026Sidley Represents Siris in Its Agreement to Acquire a Majority Stake in TAKKIONMarch 10, 2026Notable Cases and Events in eDiscoveryMarch 6, 202611th Circ. NextEra Ruling Broadens Loss Causation StandardMarch 3, 2026Superpowers — and Potential Perils: Deploying AI for BusinessMarch 2026Generative AI and Privilege: Practical Lessons from Two Early Decisions and What Comes NextFebruary 27, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
