Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Advised Energy Transfer on US$2.625 Billion Acquisition of Vaquero MidstreamOctober 6, 2026Notable Cases and Events in eDiscoveryOctober 1, 2026Sidley Advises InfraBridge on Sale of 50% Interest in 5.4 GW Power Portfolio to ArcLightSeptember 30, 2026Sidley Represents Electronics for Imaging in Its Combination With Agfa’s Digital Printing Solutions BusinessSeptember 28, 2026Delaware Chancery Ruling Addresses Public Benefit Corporation Directors’ Price-Maximization DutySeptember 22, 2026U.S. Department of Justice Announces Major Justice Manual Revisions on Sub-Regulatory Guidance and Dismissals of False Claims Act Qui TamsSeptember 21, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
