Daily Journal
Sugar-Sweetened Drinks & The First Amendment
September 29, 2017
From coast to coast, cities have responded to products raising public health concerns with laws that are intended to compel consumers to make different purchasing decisions. These cities' motives, however altruistic, often cannot be squared with the limits of their authority and the constitutional rights of others. New York's attempt to ban the sale of certain high-sugar beverages in excess of 16 ounces was shut down by the courts a few years ago. More recently, San Francisco's effort to require tobacco-style health warnings on billboards and other large-scale outdoor advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages was enjoined from taking effect.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Discusses Protective Orders and Generative AI in DiscoveryApril 20, 2026Josie Welland Featured on Fraud Matters Podcast Episode, “Supply Chain Fraud: An All-Business Problem”April 20, 2026UK Competition and Markets Authority Issues £4.2M Fine and Orders £760k of Refunds for Drip PricingApril 20, 2026Jessica Fishfeld Rejoins Sidley's Commercial Litigation and Disputes Practice in MiamiApril 20, 2026Sidley Shortlisted at the FT Innovative Lawyers Awards Asia-Pacific 2026April 10, 2026Generative AI in Discovery: Protective Orders as an Emerging Point of DisputeApril 6, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
