Law360
Expect Scrutiny In Del. Bankruptcy-Alternative Proceedings
July 29, 2022
The Delaware Court of Chancery took the old maxim "justice delayed is justice denied" to heart recently, when it denied a request for a stay of proceedings hours after the request had been filed.
The ruling from Vice Chancellor Paul A. Fioravanti Jr., in In re: Kidbox.com Inc., is the latest in a series of rulings from the Court of Chancery requiring litigants in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware to support their petitions for relief with sufficient disclosures, and to avoid bare-boned pleadings.
These rulings further signal that counsel engaged in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware should be prepared for a higher level of scrutiny from the Court of Chancery.
Related Blogs
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Bad Investments, Not Bad Faith: Caremark Claims Have LimitsApril 21, 2026Sidley Discusses Protective Orders and Generative AI in DiscoveryApril 20, 2026Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces the Importance of Precision in Drafting ADR Provisions in Merger AgreementsApril 14, 2026Sidley Represents AIP in Its US$1.272 Billion Acquisition of Avanos MedicalApril 14, 2026Delaware LLC Parties Cannot Bypass Fiduciary Waivers via Implied CovenantApril 12, 2026Generative AI in Discovery: Protective Orders as an Emerging Point of DisputeApril 6, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
