Law360
Expect Scrutiny In Del. Bankruptcy-Alternative Proceedings
July 29, 2022
The Delaware Court of Chancery took the old maxim "justice delayed is justice denied" to heart recently, when it denied a request for a stay of proceedings hours after the request had been filed.
The ruling from Vice Chancellor Paul A. Fioravanti Jr., in In re: Kidbox.com Inc., is the latest in a series of rulings from the Court of Chancery requiring litigants in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware to support their petitions for relief with sufficient disclosures, and to avoid bare-boned pleadings.
These rulings further signal that counsel engaged in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware should be prepared for a higher level of scrutiny from the Court of Chancery.
Related Blogs
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Activist That Encouraged Merger Only To Change Its Mind Denied “Extraordinary Remedy” Of A Deal InjunctionMarch 18, 2026Simon Says, “Freeze!”: Court of Chancery Confirms that Company Counsel Must Play Neutral When Equal Ownership Board Is DeadlockedMarch 16, 2026Sidley Discusses Delaware Supreme Court Decision Upholding Section 144 Safe Harbor AmendmentsMarch 16, 2026New U.S. DOJ Antitrust Leadership Signals More Criminal Prosecutions and Longer Prison SentencesMarch 6, 2026Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Section 144 Safe Harbor AmendmentsMarch 3, 2026Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Section 144 Safe Harbor AmendmentsMarch 2, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
