Law360
Expect Scrutiny In Del. Bankruptcy-Alternative Proceedings
July 29, 2022
The Delaware Court of Chancery took the old maxim "justice delayed is justice denied" to heart recently, when it denied a request for a stay of proceedings hours after the request had been filed.
The ruling from Vice Chancellor Paul A. Fioravanti Jr., in In re: Kidbox.com Inc., is the latest in a series of rulings from the Court of Chancery requiring litigants in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware to support their petitions for relief with sufficient disclosures, and to avoid bare-boned pleadings.
These rulings further signal that counsel engaged in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware should be prepared for a higher level of scrutiny from the Court of Chancery.
Related Blogs
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Texas Corporate Litigation Reforms Take Hold: Federal Court Enforces Texas’s 3% Ownership Requirement for Derivative ClaimsMay 12, 2026Sidley Represents Noble Environmental Co-Founder Richard Walton in Apollo’s Acquisition of a Majority Stake in Noble EnvironmentalMay 12, 2026When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY DecisionMay 11, 2026Sidley Represents MacroGenics in the Sale of Its GMP Manufacturing OperationsMay 11, 2026Who Started It? Delaware Court of Chancery to Address Whether Contacting DOJ Is ‘Initiating’ a Proceeding in Advancement CaseMay 5, 2026Securities Litigation Against Life Sciences Companies: 2025May 1, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
