Law360
Expect Scrutiny In Del. Bankruptcy-Alternative Proceedings
July 29, 2022
The Delaware Court of Chancery took the old maxim "justice delayed is justice denied" to heart recently, when it denied a request for a stay of proceedings hours after the request had been filed.
The ruling from Vice Chancellor Paul A. Fioravanti Jr., in In re: Kidbox.com Inc., is the latest in a series of rulings from the Court of Chancery requiring litigants in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware to support their petitions for relief with sufficient disclosures, and to avoid bare-boned pleadings.
These rulings further signal that counsel engaged in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware should be prepared for a higher level of scrutiny from the Court of Chancery.
Related Blogs
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Alignment Is Not Control: Court of Chancery Dismisses the KnowBe4 ChallengeJuly 29, 2026Using Disclosure Processes to Defend Securities Fraud CasesJuly 27, 2026Timing Is Everything: Section 220 Standing After a Merger ClosesJuly 23, 2026Inspection Rights, Internal Affairs, and Personal Jurisdiction: Orchid Global’s Procedural LessonJuly 15, 2026Delaware Court of Chancery Draws a Line on Release Conditions in M&AJuly 8, 2026A Purchase-Price Adjustment Is Not the End of the Road With Indemnification on the TableJuly 1, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
