Law360
Expect Scrutiny In Del. Bankruptcy-Alternative Proceedings
July 29, 2022
The Delaware Court of Chancery took the old maxim "justice delayed is justice denied" to heart recently, when it denied a request for a stay of proceedings hours after the request had been filed.
The ruling from Vice Chancellor Paul A. Fioravanti Jr., in In re: Kidbox.com Inc., is the latest in a series of rulings from the Court of Chancery requiring litigants in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware to support their petitions for relief with sufficient disclosures, and to avoid bare-boned pleadings.
These rulings further signal that counsel engaged in bankruptcy-alternative proceedings in Delaware should be prepared for a higher level of scrutiny from the Court of Chancery.
Related Blogs
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
California Appellate Court Affirms Enforceability of Federal Forum Provisions in Securities Act LitigationDecember 17, 2025Sidley Secures Plan Confirmation in Prospect Medical Holdings' US$2.3 Billion Chapter 11 CaseDecember 17, 2025Sidley Represents Immunovant in US$550 Million OfferingDecember 12, 2025Sidley Elects Partnership Class of 29 and Counsel Class of 15 Across Europe and U.S.December 11, 2025Court of Chancery Reaffirms High Bar for Challenging Advance Notice Bylaws, but Emphasizes the Importance of Clear DraftingDecember 10, 2025When a Whistleblower Complaint Becomes a Board-Level “Red Flag”December 3, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
