Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
What Happens With the Former Board, Stays With the Former Board: Delaware Court Dismisses Claims Against Directors for Failing to Investigate Past Misconduct
August 31, 2025
In Borsody v. Gibson, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed all claims brought by a former director who alleged he was wrongfully ousted from Nervive, Inc. and denied stock options. The Court found the claims time-barred under the three-year statute of limitations and rejected attempts to reframe them as breaches of fiduciary duty for failing to investigate or remedy past misconduct. It further held that the directors could not be liable for contractual obligations to which they were not parties, nor could they aid and abet co-fiduciaries. The ruling underscores that equity will not revive stale claims or allow contractual disputes to be repackaged as fiduciary duty breaches.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY DecisionMay 11, 2026Who Started It? Delaware Court of Chancery to Address Whether Contacting DOJ Is ‘Initiating’ a Proceeding in Advancement CaseMay 5, 2026Securities Litigation Against Life Sciences Companies: 2025May 1, 2026Sidley Represents OppFi In Its Acquisition of BNCC and BNC National BankApril 29, 2026Bad Investments, Not Bad Faith: Caremark Claims Have LimitsApril 21, 2026Sidley Represents Galera Therapeutics in Its Merger With Obsidian Therapeutics and US$350 Million Private Placement FinancingApril 21, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
