Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
What Happens With the Former Board, Stays With the Former Board: Delaware Court Dismisses Claims Against Directors for Failing to Investigate Past Misconduct
August 31, 2025
In Borsody v. Gibson, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed all claims brought by a former director who alleged he was wrongfully ousted from Nervive, Inc. and denied stock options. The Court found the claims time-barred under the three-year statute of limitations and rejected attempts to reframe them as breaches of fiduciary duty for failing to investigate or remedy past misconduct. It further held that the directors could not be liable for contractual obligations to which they were not parties, nor could they aid and abet co-fiduciaries. The ruling underscores that equity will not revive stale claims or allow contractual disputes to be repackaged as fiduciary duty breaches.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
When a Whistleblower Complaint Becomes a Board-Level "Red Flag"December 19, 2025California Appellate Court Affirms Enforceability of Federal Forum Provisions in Securities Act LitigationDecember 17, 2025Sidley Represents ABM In Its US$275 Million Acquisition of WGNSTARDecember 17, 2025Sidley Elects Partnership Class and Counsel Class Across Europe and U.S.December 11, 2025Court of Chancery Reaffirms High Bar for Challenging Advance Notice Bylaws, but Emphasizes the Importance of Clear DraftingDecember 10, 2025When a Whistleblower Complaint Becomes a Board-Level “Red Flag”December 3, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
