Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
What Happens With the Former Board, Stays With the Former Board: Delaware Court Dismisses Claims Against Directors for Failing to Investigate Past Misconduct
August 31, 2025
In Borsody v. Gibson, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed all claims brought by a former director who alleged he was wrongfully ousted from Nervive, Inc. and denied stock options. The Court found the claims time-barred under the three-year statute of limitations and rejected attempts to reframe them as breaches of fiduciary duty for failing to investigate or remedy past misconduct. It further held that the directors could not be liable for contractual obligations to which they were not parties, nor could they aid and abet co-fiduciaries. The ruling underscores that equity will not revive stale claims or allow contractual disputes to be repackaged as fiduciary duty breaches.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
The Nonprofit Boardroom: Current Issues, Considerations, and Emerging RisksWednesday, November 4, 2026Lipp v. Mixedbread AI Addresses How a Company Can End an Advancement ObligationOctober 23, 2026Sidley Ranked in Chambers UK 2027October 15, 2026The C-Suite Is Not a Jurisdictional Catchall: Court of Chancery Clarifies Delaware’s Officer-Consent StatuteOctober 14, 2026Corporate College 2026Wednesday, October 14, 2026 - Thursday, October 15, 2026Still Experts After Stillfront: Two Chancery Decisions Confine Independent Accountants to Accounting DisputesOctober 8, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
