Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
What Happens With the Former Board, Stays With the Former Board: Delaware Court Dismisses Claims Against Directors for Failing to Investigate Past Misconduct
August 31, 2025
In Borsody v. Gibson, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed all claims brought by a former director who alleged he was wrongfully ousted from Nervive, Inc. and denied stock options. The Court found the claims time-barred under the three-year statute of limitations and rejected attempts to reframe them as breaches of fiduciary duty for failing to investigate or remedy past misconduct. It further held that the directors could not be liable for contractual obligations to which they were not parties, nor could they aid and abet co-fiduciaries. The ruling underscores that equity will not revive stale claims or allow contractual disputes to be repackaged as fiduciary duty breaches.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Inspection Rights, Internal Affairs, and Personal Jurisdiction: Orchid Global’s Procedural LessonJuly 15, 2026Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Stockholder Claims as Derivative, Unripe, and UntimelyJuly 14, 2026Sidley Ranked Among Latinvex’s 2026 Top International Law FirmsJuly 9, 2026Delaware Court of Chancery Draws a Line on Release Conditions in M&AJuly 8, 2026Corporate Criminal Liability: Are You Ready for the New RulesThursday, July 2, 2026A Purchase-Price Adjustment Is Not the End of the Road With Indemnification on the TableJuly 1, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
