Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
What Happens With the Former Board, Stays With the Former Board: Delaware Court Dismisses Claims Against Directors for Failing to Investigate Past Misconduct
August 31, 2025
In Borsody v. Gibson, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed all claims brought by a former director who alleged he was wrongfully ousted from Nervive, Inc. and denied stock options. The Court found the claims time-barred under the three-year statute of limitations and rejected attempts to reframe them as breaches of fiduciary duty for failing to investigate or remedy past misconduct. It further held that the directors could not be liable for contractual obligations to which they were not parties, nor could they aid and abet co-fiduciaries. The ruling underscores that equity will not revive stale claims or allow contractual disputes to be repackaged as fiduciary duty breaches.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Activist That Encouraged Merger Only To Change Its Mind Denied “Extraordinary Remedy” Of A Deal InjunctionMarch 18, 2026Simon Says, “Freeze!”: Court of Chancery Confirms that Company Counsel Must Play Neutral When Equal Ownership Board Is DeadlockedMarch 16, 2026Sidley Discusses Delaware Supreme Court Decision Upholding Section 144 Safe Harbor AmendmentsMarch 16, 2026Sidley Adds Corporate and Securities Partner Steven Przesmicki in San DiegoMarch 10, 2026Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Section 144 Safe Harbor AmendmentsMarch 3, 2026Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Section 144 Safe Harbor AmendmentsMarch 2, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
