Reuters
False Claims Act Liability: When Do Claims for Health Care Reimbursement 'Result From' Anti-Kickback Statute Violations?
September 25, 2025
The Department of Justice and Department of Health and Human Services recently renewed their False Claims Act (FCA) Working Group, reinforcing scrutiny of health care and life sciences companies, with a focus on Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) violations. A circuit split has developed over whether FCA liability requires strict “but-for” causation between AKS violations and reimbursement claims, or only a looser “link.” Most circuits now favor the more stringent “but-for” standard, while the 3rd Circuit continues to apply the link test. As courts move toward the stricter view, DOJ and relators are increasingly relying on false certification theories to pursue FCA claims tied to AKS violations.
連絡先

得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Texas Supreme Court Imposes Materiality Requirement on Texas Healthcare Fraud Omissions ClaimsJuly 7, 2026Texas AG Secures Nearly $34 Million Settlement with Pharmaceutical Company, Reinforcing Active Ongoing THFPA EnforcementJuly 6, 2026HHS-OIG Decertifies New York Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, Escalating Federal Scrutiny of State Medicaid Fraud EnforcementJuly 6, 2026In House Hearing, DAAG Jenny Discusses FCA Enforcement Priorities Related to Grants, Faces Questioning on Using FCA to Target DiscriminationJune 29, 2026DOJ Reaches $507,144 Settlement with Defense Contractor, Signals Increased FCA Scrutiny of Cybersecurity Self-AssessmentsJune 23, 2026Challenging Executive Order on DEI, States Say It Gets FCA Materiality WrongJune 15, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
