Reuters
False Claims Act Liability: When Do Claims for Health Care Reimbursement 'Result From' Anti-Kickback Statute Violations?
September 25, 2025
The Department of Justice and Department of Health and Human Services recently renewed their False Claims Act (FCA) Working Group, reinforcing scrutiny of health care and life sciences companies, with a focus on Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) violations. A circuit split has developed over whether FCA liability requires strict “but-for” causation between AKS violations and reimbursement claims, or only a looser “link.” Most circuits now favor the more stringent “but-for” standard, while the 3rd Circuit continues to apply the link test. As courts move toward the stricter view, DOJ and relators are increasingly relying on false certification theories to pursue FCA claims tied to AKS violations.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
False Claims Act Risk on the RadarTuesday, October 6, 2026Court Holds Insurer Must Cover FCA Settlement Despite “Fraudulent Acts” ExclusionOctober 2, 2026DOJ Continues to Prioritize Medicare Advantage Enforcement with $22.5 Million SettlementOctober 1, 2026Texas Medicaid Fraud Decision Leaves 2 Open QuestionsOctober 1, 2026D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office Announces Creation of Standalone Division Focused on False Claims Act EnforcementSeptember 25, 2026U.S. Department of Justice Announces Major Justice Manual Revisions on Sub-Regulatory Guidance and Dismissals of FCA Qui TamsSeptember 21, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

