Reuters
False Claims Act Liability: When Do Claims for Health Care Reimbursement 'Result From' Anti-Kickback Statute Violations?
September 25, 2025
The Department of Justice and Department of Health and Human Services recently renewed their False Claims Act (FCA) Working Group, reinforcing scrutiny of health care and life sciences companies, with a focus on Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) violations. A circuit split has developed over whether FCA liability requires strict “but-for” causation between AKS violations and reimbursement claims, or only a looser “link.” Most circuits now favor the more stringent “but-for” standard, while the 3rd Circuit continues to apply the link test. As courts move toward the stricter view, DOJ and relators are increasingly relying on false certification theories to pursue FCA claims tied to AKS violations.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
District of Massachusetts Rejects Per Se AKS Liability for Commissioned, Independent Contractor Sales Representatives But Allows FCA Claims to ProceedOctober 26, 2026DOJ and HHS Launch Healthcare FCA Self-Disclosure Pilot Program with Fixed Repayment MultiplierOctober 22, 2026HHS Secretary Extends HHS-OIG Exclusion Authority to CMS, Expanding the Administration's Anti-Fraud CampaignOctober 19, 2026DOJ Fraud Division and HHS-OIG Announce Joint Self-Disclosure Policy, Directing Healthcare Companies to Bring Potential Criminal Matters to DOJ FirstOctober 16, 2026Court Grants Summary Judgment in Kickback-Based FCA Case, Holding Relator Failed to Prove Remuneration or WillfulnessOctober 7, 2026False Claims Act Risk on the RadarTuesday, October 6, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

