BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
June DOJ/SBA FCA Settlement Highlights Continued Focus on Contractor ComplianceJuly 15, 2026Texas Supreme Court Imposes Materiality Requirement on Texas Healthcare Fraud Omissions ClaimsJuly 7, 2026Texas AG Secures Nearly $34 Million Settlement with Pharmaceutical Company, Reinforcing Active Ongoing THFPA EnforcementJuly 6, 2026HHS-OIG Decertifies New York Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, Escalating Federal Scrutiny of State Medicaid Fraud EnforcementJuly 6, 2026In House Hearing, DAAG Jenny Discusses FCA Enforcement Priorities Related to Grants, Faces Questioning on Using FCA to Target DiscriminationJune 29, 2026DOJ Reaches $507,144 Settlement with Defense Contractor, Signals Increased FCA Scrutiny of Cybersecurity Self-AssessmentsJune 23, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

