BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
$14.1 Million FCA Settlement Underscores Medicare Advantage Coding ScrutinyAugust 6, 2026New York Ethics Opinion Addresses Ethical Limits on Attorney Participation in Whistleblower InvestigationsJuly 30, 2026Laboratory, Owners, and Investors Settle COVID-19 Testing Fraud Allegations for $24 MillionJuly 27, 2026DOJ Releases FOCUS Questionnaire to Assist in Evaluating Qui Tams Filed by Data MinersJuly 20, 2026June DOJ/SBA FCA Settlement Highlights Continued Focus on Contractor ComplianceJuly 15, 2026Texas Supreme Court Imposes Materiality Requirement on Texas Healthcare Fraud Omissions ClaimsJuly 7, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

