BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Ninth Circuit Opens Door to FCA Liability for Alleged 340B OverchargesMarch 19, 2026Fourth Circuit Highlights Tougher Path to Dismissal of FCA Cases Post-SuperValuMarch 18, 2026Fifth Circuit Panel Produces Three Opinions Wrestling with Application of First to File BarMarch 13, 2026Sidley Wins a Trio of Awards at the 2026 Benchmark Litigation US AwardsMarch 12, 2026Strictly Enforcing Rule 9(b), Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FCA Claim Based on Allegedly Defective Medical DevicesMarch 4, 2026Court Grants Motion to Dismiss FCA Claim for Failure Adequately to Plead ScienterMarch 3, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

