BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
TX AG’s Office Continues Aggressive Enforcement Against Healthcare Entities Operating in TexasFebruary 25, 2026DAAG Brenna Jenny Warns Heightened FCA Enforcement Is “The New Normal,” Addresses Enforcement Priorities and PoliciesFebruary 20, 2026DAAG Jenny Reinforces Commitment to FCA Enforcement Premised on “Unlawful DEI”February 20, 2026DOJ Attorneys Underscore Heightened Focus on Trade Fraud During the Annual Qui Tam ConferenceFebruary 19, 2026Drug Pricing and Medicaid Rebate Reporting: Enforcement Risk RemainsFebruary 17, 2026OIG Releases Long-Awaited Medicare Advantage Compliance Program GuidanceFebruary 10, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

