BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
連絡先
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Lawyers Jaime Jones, Jennifer Saulino, and Lisa Miller to Speak at the ABA′s 2026 Qui Tam & Civil False Claims and Healthcare Fraud Institute in Washington, D.C.Wednesday, May 27, 2026 – Thursday, May 28, 2026The First Prediction Market Insider Trading Case: SDNY and CFTC Test the Limits of Fraud and Commodities LawMay 13, 2026DOJ’s National Fraud Enforcement Division Launches West Coast Health Care Fraud Strike ForceMay 6, 2026E.D. Pa. Rejects Indefinite Sealing of FCA Extension Materials, Emphasizing Narrow Purpose of SealMay 5, 2026Texas Qui Tam Under Fire: Texas Appellate Dissent Raises Major Constitutional DoubtsMay 4, 2026Clear and Present Danger: DOJ Trade Fraud and Anti-Corruption Priorities Signal Lasting Compliance RiskJuly–August 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

