BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
False Claims Act Risk on the RadarTuesday, October 6, 2026U.S. Department of Justice Announces Major Justice Manual Revisions on Sub-Regulatory Guidance and Dismissals of FCA Qui TamsSeptember 21, 2026U.S. Department of Justice Announces Major Justice Manual Revisions on Sub-Regulatory Guidance and Dismissals of False Claims Act Qui TamsSeptember 21, 2026DOJ Announces Largest Settlement Yet in Drive to Use the FCA to Target Alleged Employment DiscriminationSeptember 16, 2026Eleventh Circuit Rejects Appointments Clause Challenge to Qui Tam MechanismSeptember 2, 2026New York Ethics Opinion Warns Lawyers on Qui Tam DeceptionSeptember 2, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

