BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
False Claims Act Risk on the RadarTuesday, October 6, 2026Eleventh Circuit Rejects Appointments Clause Challenge to Qui Tam MechanismSeptember 2, 2026New York Ethics Opinion Warns Lawyers on Qui Tam DeceptionSeptember 2, 2026DOJ Continues Medicare Advantage Enforcement Focus with $541.5 Million SettlementAugust 31, 2026DOJ Announces Second Settlement Resolving FCA Allegations Based on Employment DiscriminationAugust 28, 2026Second Circuit Clarifies Scope of “Property” that an FCA “Claim” May SeekAugust 17, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

