BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Texas Qui Tam Under Fire: Texas Appellate Dissent Raises Major Constitutional DoubtsMay 4, 2026DOJ Announces FOCUS Initiative to Work with Data Miners Filing Qui TamsApril 30, 2026New Guidance on U.S. Procurement Raises Risk to Federal Contractors From Potentially Discriminatory PracticesApril 29, 2026Ninth Circuit Rejects $8.5M Award Of Attorneys’ Fees to FCA WhistleblowerApril 14, 2026DOJ Announces First FCA Settlement Resolving Title VII Discrimination AllegationsApril 13, 2026White House and DOJ Announce Sweeping New Anti-Fraud InitiativesApril 10, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

