BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
First Circuit Clarifies Application of Medicare’s “Reasonable and Necessary” Standard in FCA Cases Against Clinical LabsDecember 8, 2025Sidley Secures Landmark FCA Defense Victory for Novo NordiskNovember 18, 2025U.S. DOJ Announces Renewal of FCA Working GroupNovember - December 2025U.S. Treasury Launches Departmentwide Review of Preference-Based Contracting ProgramsNovember 11, 2025Torrey Cope Featured on Fierce Biotech's The Top Line Podcast Episode, "Unpacking the FDA Transparency Push on CRLs"October 17, 2025DOJ Announces Renewal of FCA Working GroupOctober 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

