BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report
Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Escobar Indicate Evolving Meaning of Materiality, But Not Its Importance
May 11, 2016
After years of litigants urging the Supreme Court to impose order on diverse lower court approaches to the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (‘‘FCA’’), the Court finally agreed this year to consider the viability of the implied certification theory. See Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar.
Reproduced with permission from BNA’s Health Care Fraud Report, 20 HFRA 325, 5/11/16. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Fifth Circuit Panel Produces Three Opinions Wrestling with Application of First to File BarMarch 13, 2026Sidley Wins a Trio of Awards at the 2026 Benchmark Litigation US AwardsMarch 12, 2026Strictly Enforcing Rule 9(b), Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FCA Claim Based on Allegedly Defective Medical DevicesMarch 4, 2026Court Grants Motion to Dismiss FCA Claim for Failure Adequately to Plead ScienterMarch 3, 2026TX AG’s Office Continues Aggressive Enforcement Against Healthcare Entities Operating in TexasFebruary 25, 2026DAAG Brenna Jenny Warns Heightened FCA Enforcement Is “The New Normal,” Addresses Enforcement Priorities and PoliciesFebruary 20, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

