The Recorder
Rule 23(f) Petitions in the Ninth Circuit: A Data-Driven Analysis
August 20, 2020
An analysis of 143 Rule 23(f) petitions at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reveals a "striking" divergence in grant rates for petitions filed by plaintiffs and those filed by defendants, according to Sidley's David Carpenter and Paula Salazar.
Offices
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Anderson v. Intel – U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari: Implications for ERISA “Excessive Fee” LitigationJanuary 26, 2026Two Sidley International Arbitration Cases Recognized on Law360’s “5 International Arbitration Cases to Watch in 2026”January 13, 2026Sidley Wins Major Ninth Circuit Antitrust AppealJanuary 13, 2026Sidley Helps Secure Complete Victory in Precedent-Setting Antitrust LitigationDecember 17, 2025Sidley Wins Landmark Ruling: Port Authority No Longer Shielded by Sovereign Immunity in Federal CourtDecember 17, 2025Brussels Dialogues: Law and Policy at the Heart of the EUFriday, December 5, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory