Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Stockholder Claims as Derivative, Unripe, and Untimely
July 14, 2026
Sidley counsel Robin Wechkin and managing associate Madison Ferraro analyze a recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision dismissing all stockholder claims in The Gregory M. Raiff 2000 Trust v. Jenzabar, Inc., holding that the claims were derivative, unripe, time-barred, or otherwise legally deficient. The article highlights the court's reaffirmation that dilution claims are generally derivative, clarifies the distinction between indemnification and advancement, and underscores the importance of timely and properly structured stockholder litigation under Delaware law.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Inspection Rights, Internal Affairs, and Personal Jurisdiction: Orchid Global’s Procedural LessonJuly 15, 2026Sidley Ranked Among Latinvex’s 2026 Top International Law FirmsJuly 9, 2026Delaware Court of Chancery Draws a Line on Release Conditions in M&AJuly 8, 2026Corporate Criminal Liability: Are You Ready for the New RulesThursday, July 2, 2026A Purchase-Price Adjustment Is Not the End of the Road With Indemnification on the TableJuly 1, 2026Sidley Represents South32 in Aluminum Value Chain Sale to Alcoa Valued up to US$5.6 BillionJune 30, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

