Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Stockholder Claims as Derivative, Unripe, and Untimely
July 14, 2026
Sidley counsel Robin Wechkin and managing associate Madison Ferraro analyze a recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision dismissing all stockholder claims in The Gregory M. Raiff 2000 Trust v. Jenzabar, Inc., holding that the claims were derivative, unripe, time-barred, or otherwise legally deficient. The article highlights the court's reaffirmation that dilution claims are generally derivative, clarifies the distinction between indemnification and advancement, and underscores the importance of timely and properly structured stockholder litigation under Delaware law.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Discusses a Unique Caremark Twist Amidst BankruptcyFebruary 17, 2026When a Whistleblower Complaint Becomes a Board-Level "Red Flag"December 19, 2025Potential Control Won’t Do: Court of Chancery Confirms Common Law Standards for Actual Control Regarding Challenged TransactionsDecember 10, 2025Chancery Court Dismisses Derivative Challenge to The Trade Desk CEO’s Compensation Award for Lack of Demand FutilityNovember 24, 2025Court of Chancery Confirms Common Law Standards for Actual Control Regarding Challenged TransactionsNovember 19, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
