Daily Journal
Common sense bar to consumer class actions
April 15, 2015
Contrary to Voltaire’s witticism that “Common sense is not so common,” it is indeed becoming somewhat common, at least in the world of consumer class actions.
On March 18, Jim Beam filed a motion to dismiss a false advertising class action challenging the “handcrafted” designation on its bourbon labels because automated processes and machinery are involved in the distillery process. Welk v. Jim Beam, 15-0328. So far this year, California courts have disposed of three consumer class actions based on common sense grounds and Jim Beam’s motion seemingly looks to capitalize on this emerging trend.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Contributory Copyright LiabilityMarch 27, 2026Maryland District Court Relies on Loper Bright to Hold Written Consent for Telemarketing Calls Not RequiredMarch 27, 2026Sidley Represents Salt & Stone in Majority Stake Acquisition by AdventMarch 24, 2026Fifth Circuit Holds U.S. FTC’s In-House Adjudication of Deceptive Advertising Claim Unconstitutional Under JarkesyMarch 24, 2026Sidley Advises Verdane in Its Partnership With SmartboxMarch 12, 2026Sidley Represents Siris in Its Agreement to Acquire a Majority Stake in TAKKIONMarch 10, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

