Daily Journal
Common sense bar to consumer class actions
April 15, 2015
Contrary to Voltaire’s witticism that “Common sense is not so common,” it is indeed becoming somewhat common, at least in the world of consumer class actions.
On March 18, Jim Beam filed a motion to dismiss a false advertising class action challenging the “handcrafted” designation on its bourbon labels because automated processes and machinery are involved in the distillery process. Welk v. Jim Beam, 15-0328. So far this year, California courts have disposed of three consumer class actions based on common sense grounds and Jim Beam’s motion seemingly looks to capitalize on this emerging trend.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Update on English Legal Advice Privilege Following the Aabar Holdings v Glencore JudgmentMay 20, 2026Sidley Advises Big 12 Conference on Partnership With RedBird Capital PartnersMay 15, 2026盛德斩获2026年《金融时报》亚太创新律师大奖May 14, 2026Sidley Represents Rigel Pharmaceuticals in Exclusive Global License Agreement with Pfizer and Arvinas for VEPPANUMay 13, 2026Sidley Ranked in Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific 2026May 13, 2026When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY DecisionMay 11, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

