Corporate Counsel
Food for Thought (and Litigation): FDA Thinks About Defining ‘Natural’
January 20, 2016
For years, many have asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to define the term “natural” for use in food labeling. Private citizens asked. Corporations asked. Even federal courts asked. But until recently, aside from an attempt at rulemaking in the early 1990s (an attempt that the FDA formally abandoned in 1993), the FDA had taken no steps to formally define the term. Rather, the FDA relied upon its policy regarding the use of “natural” as meaning that nothing artificial or synthetic (including all color additives, regardless of source) has been included in, or has been added to, a food.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
UK Competition and Markets Authority Issues £4.2M Fine and Orders £760k of Refunds for Drip PricingApril 20, 2026Sidley Helps Secure Appellate Victory for Princeton University in Ivy League Athletic Scholarships Antitrust Class ActionApril 6, 2026Maryland District Court Relies on Loper Bright to Hold Written Consent for Telemarketing Calls Not RequiredMarch 27, 2026Fifth Circuit Holds U.S. FTC’s In-House Adjudication of Deceptive Advertising Claim Unconstitutional Under JarkesyMarch 24, 202611th Circ. NextEra Ruling Broadens Loss Causation StandardMarch 3, 2026Generative AI and Privilege: Practical Lessons from Two Early Decisions and What Comes NextFebruary 27, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
