Corporate Counsel
Food for Thought (and Litigation): FDA Thinks About Defining ‘Natural’
January 20, 2016
For years, many have asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to define the term “natural” for use in food labeling. Private citizens asked. Corporations asked. Even federal courts asked. But until recently, aside from an attempt at rulemaking in the early 1990s (an attempt that the FDA formally abandoned in 1993), the FDA had taken no steps to formally define the term. Rather, the FDA relied upon its policy regarding the use of “natural” as meaning that nothing artificial or synthetic (including all color additives, regardless of source) has been included in, or has been added to, a food.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
2026 Momentum Food and Beverage ExchangeOctober 6-7, 2026Eight Sidley Lawyers Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 “Top 250 Women in Litigation” ListAugust 14, 2026Sidley Wins Finance “Litigation Department of the Year” and Earns Multiple Honors at the Texas Legal Awards 2026August 5, 2026Don't Touch That Thermostat: Senate Examines Consumer Product Safety Commission Nominees Amid Agency OverhaulsJune 24, 2026Florida Driver Ruling Shows Renewed Focus On Privacy StandingJune 11, 2026Michelle Doolin and Wendy Lazerson Named to Daily Journal’s 2026 “Top Women Lawyers” ListJune 10, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
