Law360
Tyson Provides Road Map For Use Of Sampling In FCA Cases
March 31, 2016
The circumstances under which statistical sampling can be used in order to establish liability in False Claims Act cases remains a controversial issue. Defendants argue that sampling results in a “trial by formula” that can result in ruinous liability based on evidence relating to a relatively small number of claims, while the U.S. Department of Justice and relators’ counsel argue that statistical sampling is an accepted form of evidence, and that limiting its use in FCA cases would have the perverse effect of immunizing the largest frauds from the full scope of liability.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Challenging Executive Order on DEI, States Say It Gets FCA Materiality WrongJune 15, 2026Sidley Highly Ranked in Chambers USA 2026June 4, 2026DOJ’s Civil Rights Fraud Initiative Raises False Claims Act Risks for Healthcare and Life Sciences CompaniesJune 4, 2026DOJ Announces Accelerated Review of FCA Qui Tams Alleging Fraud Against State-Administered Benefits ProgramsMay 28, 2026Sidley Lawyers Jaime Jones, Jennifer Saulino, and Lisa Miller to Speak at the ABA′s 2026 Qui Tam & Civil False Claims and Healthcare Fraud Institute in Washington, D.C.Wednesday, May 27, 2026 – Thursday, May 28, 2026DOJ and Texas AG Announce First Settlement in National Investigation of Gender-Affirming Care for MinorsMay 26, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
