Law360
Tyson Provides Road Map For Use Of Sampling In FCA Cases
March 31, 2016
The circumstances under which statistical sampling can be used in order to establish liability in False Claims Act cases remains a controversial issue. Defendants argue that sampling results in a “trial by formula” that can result in ruinous liability based on evidence relating to a relatively small number of claims, while the U.S. Department of Justice and relators’ counsel argue that statistical sampling is an accepted form of evidence, and that limiting its use in FCA cases would have the perverse effect of immunizing the largest frauds from the full scope of liability.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Lawyers Jaime Jones, Jennifer Saulino, and Lisa Miller to Speak at the ABA′s 2026 Qui Tam & Civil False Claims and Healthcare Fraud Institute in Washington, D.C.Wednesday, May 27, 2026 – Thursday, May 28, 2026The First Prediction Market Insider Trading Case: SDNY and CFTC Test the Limits of Fraud and Commodities LawMay 13, 2026DOJ’s National Fraud Enforcement Division Launches West Coast Health Care Fraud Strike ForceMay 6, 2026E.D. Pa. Rejects Indefinite Sealing of FCA Extension Materials, Emphasizing Narrow Purpose of SealMay 5, 2026Texas Qui Tam Under Fire: Texas Appellate Dissent Raises Major Constitutional DoubtsMay 4, 2026Clear and Present Danger: DOJ Trade Fraud and Anti-Corruption Priorities Signal Lasting Compliance RiskJuly–August 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
