Law360
Tyson Provides Road Map For Use Of Sampling In FCA Cases
March 31, 2016
The circumstances under which statistical sampling can be used in order to establish liability in False Claims Act cases remains a controversial issue. Defendants argue that sampling results in a “trial by formula” that can result in ruinous liability based on evidence relating to a relatively small number of claims, while the U.S. Department of Justice and relators’ counsel argue that statistical sampling is an accepted form of evidence, and that limiting its use in FCA cases would have the perverse effect of immunizing the largest frauds from the full scope of liability.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Court Grants Summary Judgment in Kickback-Based FCA Case, Holding Relator Failed to Prove Remuneration or WillfulnessOctober 7, 2026False Claims Act Risk on the RadarTuesday, October 6, 2026Court Holds Insurer Must Cover FCA Settlement Despite “Fraudulent Acts” ExclusionOctober 2, 2026DOJ Continues to Prioritize Medicare Advantage Enforcement with $22.5 Million SettlementOctober 1, 2026Texas Medicaid Fraud Decision Leaves 2 Open QuestionsOctober 1, 2026D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office Announces Creation of Standalone Division Focused on False Claims Act EnforcementSeptember 25, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
