Law360
Tyson Provides Road Map For Use Of Sampling In FCA Cases
March 31, 2016
The circumstances under which statistical sampling can be used in order to establish liability in False Claims Act cases remains a controversial issue. Defendants argue that sampling results in a “trial by formula” that can result in ruinous liability based on evidence relating to a relatively small number of claims, while the U.S. Department of Justice and relators’ counsel argue that statistical sampling is an accepted form of evidence, and that limiting its use in FCA cases would have the perverse effect of immunizing the largest frauds from the full scope of liability.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Ninth Circuit Rejects $8.5M Award Of Attorneys’ Fees to FCA WhistleblowerApril 14, 2026DOJ Announces First FCA Settlement Resolving Title VII Discrimination AllegationsApril 13, 2026White House and DOJ Announce Sweeping New Anti-Fraud InitiativesApril 10, 2026Ninth Circuit Opens Door to FCA Liability for Alleged 340B OverchargesMarch 19, 2026Fourth Circuit Highlights Tougher Path to Dismissal of FCA Cases Post-SuperValuMarch 18, 2026Fifth Circuit Panel Produces Three Opinions Wrestling with Application of First to File BarMarch 13, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
