Law360
Tyson Provides Road Map For Use Of Sampling In FCA Cases
March 31, 2016
The circumstances under which statistical sampling can be used in order to establish liability in False Claims Act cases remains a controversial issue. Defendants argue that sampling results in a “trial by formula” that can result in ruinous liability based on evidence relating to a relatively small number of claims, while the U.S. Department of Justice and relators’ counsel argue that statistical sampling is an accepted form of evidence, and that limiting its use in FCA cases would have the perverse effect of immunizing the largest frauds from the full scope of liability.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
$14.1 Million FCA Settlement Underscores Medicare Advantage Coding ScrutinyAugust 6, 2026New York Ethics Opinion Addresses Ethical Limits on Attorney Participation in Whistleblower InvestigationsJuly 30, 2026Laboratory, Owners, and Investors Settle COVID-19 Testing Fraud Allegations for $24 MillionJuly 27, 2026DOJ Releases FOCUS Questionnaire to Assist in Evaluating Qui Tams Filed by Data MinersJuly 20, 2026June DOJ/SBA FCA Settlement Highlights Continued Focus on Contractor ComplianceJuly 15, 2026Texas Supreme Court Imposes Materiality Requirement on Texas Healthcare Fraud Omissions ClaimsJuly 7, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
