Law360
Tyson Provides Road Map For Use Of Sampling In FCA Cases
March 31, 2016
The circumstances under which statistical sampling can be used in order to establish liability in False Claims Act cases remains a controversial issue. Defendants argue that sampling results in a “trial by formula” that can result in ruinous liability based on evidence relating to a relatively small number of claims, while the U.S. Department of Justice and relators’ counsel argue that statistical sampling is an accepted form of evidence, and that limiting its use in FCA cases would have the perverse effect of immunizing the largest frauds from the full scope of liability.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
June DOJ/SBA FCA Settlement Highlights Continued Focus on Contractor ComplianceJuly 15, 2026Texas Supreme Court Imposes Materiality Requirement on Texas Healthcare Fraud Omissions ClaimsJuly 7, 2026Texas AG Secures Nearly $34 Million Settlement with Pharmaceutical Company, Reinforcing Active Ongoing THFPA EnforcementJuly 6, 2026HHS-OIG Decertifies New York Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, Escalating Federal Scrutiny of State Medicaid Fraud EnforcementJuly 6, 2026In House Hearing, DAAG Jenny Discusses FCA Enforcement Priorities Related to Grants, Faces Questioning on Using FCA to Target DiscriminationJune 29, 2026DOJ Reaches $507,144 Settlement with Defense Contractor, Signals Increased FCA Scrutiny of Cybersecurity Self-AssessmentsJune 23, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
