Law360
Tyson Provides Road Map For Use Of Sampling In FCA Cases
March 31, 2016
The circumstances under which statistical sampling can be used in order to establish liability in False Claims Act cases remains a controversial issue. Defendants argue that sampling results in a “trial by formula” that can result in ruinous liability based on evidence relating to a relatively small number of claims, while the U.S. Department of Justice and relators’ counsel argue that statistical sampling is an accepted form of evidence, and that limiting its use in FCA cases would have the perverse effect of immunizing the largest frauds from the full scope of liability.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
False Claims Act Risk on the RadarTuesday, October 6, 2026U.S. Department of Justice Announces Major Justice Manual Revisions on Sub-Regulatory Guidance and Dismissals of FCA Qui TamsSeptember 21, 2026U.S. Department of Justice Announces Major Justice Manual Revisions on Sub-Regulatory Guidance and Dismissals of False Claims Act Qui TamsSeptember 21, 2026DOJ Announces Largest Settlement Yet in Drive to Use the FCA to Target Alleged Employment DiscriminationSeptember 16, 2026Eleventh Circuit Rejects Appointments Clause Challenge to Qui Tam MechanismSeptember 2, 2026New York Ethics Opinion Warns Lawyers on Qui Tam DeceptionSeptember 2, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
