Law360
Skyrocketing FCA Penalties Ripe For Constitutional Challenges
July 12, 2016
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced dramatically higher civil penalties under the False Claims Act, pursuant to authorization in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. The announced increases make the FCA’s already draconian penalties even more so, particularly in cases involving individual claims for small dollar amounts. To date, constitutional objections to outsized FCA judgments have experienced little success. But the higher penalty ranges may change the calculus of how courts view constitutional challenges to FCA civil penalties, creating opportunity for defendants finally to gain traction in arguing for constitutional limits to FCA penalties.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Challenging Executive Order on DEI, States Say It Gets FCA Materiality WrongJune 15, 2026Sidley Highly Ranked in Chambers USA 2026June 4, 2026DOJ’s Civil Rights Fraud Initiative Raises False Claims Act Risks for Healthcare and Life Sciences CompaniesJune 4, 2026DOJ Announces Accelerated Review of FCA Qui Tams Alleging Fraud Against State-Administered Benefits ProgramsMay 28, 2026Sidley Lawyers Jaime Jones, Jennifer Saulino, and Lisa Miller to Speak at the ABA′s 2026 Qui Tam & Civil False Claims and Healthcare Fraud Institute in Washington, D.C.Wednesday, May 27, 2026 – Thursday, May 28, 2026DOJ and Texas AG Announce First Settlement in National Investigation of Gender-Affirming Care for MinorsMay 26, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
