Law360
Skyrocketing FCA Penalties Ripe For Constitutional Challenges
July 12, 2016
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced dramatically higher civil penalties under the False Claims Act, pursuant to authorization in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. The announced increases make the FCA’s already draconian penalties even more so, particularly in cases involving individual claims for small dollar amounts. To date, constitutional objections to outsized FCA judgments have experienced little success. But the higher penalty ranges may change the calculus of how courts view constitutional challenges to FCA civil penalties, creating opportunity for defendants finally to gain traction in arguing for constitutional limits to FCA penalties.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Court Grants Summary Judgment in Kickback-Based FCA Case, Holding Relator Failed to Prove Remuneration or WillfulnessOctober 7, 2026False Claims Act Risk on the RadarTuesday, October 6, 2026Court Holds Insurer Must Cover FCA Settlement Despite “Fraudulent Acts” ExclusionOctober 2, 2026DOJ Continues to Prioritize Medicare Advantage Enforcement with $22.5 Million SettlementOctober 1, 2026Texas Medicaid Fraud Decision Leaves 2 Open QuestionsOctober 1, 2026D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office Announces Creation of Standalone Division Focused on False Claims Act EnforcementSeptember 25, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
