Law360
Skyrocketing FCA Penalties Ripe For Constitutional Challenges
July 12, 2016
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced dramatically higher civil penalties under the False Claims Act, pursuant to authorization in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. The announced increases make the FCA’s already draconian penalties even more so, particularly in cases involving individual claims for small dollar amounts. To date, constitutional objections to outsized FCA judgments have experienced little success. But the higher penalty ranges may change the calculus of how courts view constitutional challenges to FCA civil penalties, creating opportunity for defendants finally to gain traction in arguing for constitutional limits to FCA penalties.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Ninth Circuit Opens Door to FCA Liability for Alleged 340B OverchargesMarch 19, 2026Fourth Circuit Highlights Tougher Path to Dismissal of FCA Cases Post-SuperValuMarch 18, 2026Fifth Circuit Panel Produces Three Opinions Wrestling with Application of First to File BarMarch 13, 2026Sidley Wins a Trio of Awards at the 2026 Benchmark Litigation US AwardsMarch 12, 2026Strictly Enforcing Rule 9(b), Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FCA Claim Based on Allegedly Defective Medical DevicesMarch 4, 2026Court Grants Motion to Dismiss FCA Claim for Failure Adequately to Plead ScienterMarch 3, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
