Law360
Skyrocketing FCA Penalties Ripe For Constitutional Challenges
July 12, 2016
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced dramatically higher civil penalties under the False Claims Act, pursuant to authorization in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. The announced increases make the FCA’s already draconian penalties even more so, particularly in cases involving individual claims for small dollar amounts. To date, constitutional objections to outsized FCA judgments have experienced little success. But the higher penalty ranges may change the calculus of how courts view constitutional challenges to FCA civil penalties, creating opportunity for defendants finally to gain traction in arguing for constitutional limits to FCA penalties.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Second Circuit Clarifies Scope of “Property” that an FCA “Claim” May SeekAugust 17, 2026DOJ’s $5.15 Million FCA Settlement Reinforces Focus on Tariff and Customs ComplianceAugust 11, 2026$14.1 Million FCA Settlement Underscores Medicare Advantage Coding ScrutinyAugust 6, 2026New York Ethics Opinion Addresses Ethical Limits on Attorney Participation in Whistleblower InvestigationsJuly 30, 2026Laboratory, Owners, and Investors Settle COVID-19 Testing Fraud Allegations for $24 MillionJuly 27, 2026DOJ Releases FOCUS Questionnaire to Assist in Evaluating Qui Tams Filed by Data MinersJuly 20, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
