Law360
Skyrocketing FCA Penalties Ripe For Constitutional Challenges
July 12, 2016
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced dramatically higher civil penalties under the False Claims Act, pursuant to authorization in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. The announced increases make the FCA’s already draconian penalties even more so, particularly in cases involving individual claims for small dollar amounts. To date, constitutional objections to outsized FCA judgments have experienced little success. But the higher penalty ranges may change the calculus of how courts view constitutional challenges to FCA civil penalties, creating opportunity for defendants finally to gain traction in arguing for constitutional limits to FCA penalties.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
June DOJ/SBA FCA Settlement Highlights Continued Focus on Contractor ComplianceJuly 15, 2026Texas Supreme Court Imposes Materiality Requirement on Texas Healthcare Fraud Omissions ClaimsJuly 7, 2026Texas AG Secures Nearly $34 Million Settlement with Pharmaceutical Company, Reinforcing Active Ongoing THFPA EnforcementJuly 6, 2026HHS-OIG Decertifies New York Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, Escalating Federal Scrutiny of State Medicaid Fraud EnforcementJuly 6, 2026In House Hearing, DAAG Jenny Discusses FCA Enforcement Priorities Related to Grants, Faces Questioning on Using FCA to Target DiscriminationJune 29, 2026DOJ Reaches $507,144 Settlement with Defense Contractor, Signals Increased FCA Scrutiny of Cybersecurity Self-AssessmentsJune 23, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
