Law360
Skyrocketing FCA Penalties Ripe For Constitutional Challenges
July 12, 2016
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced dramatically higher civil penalties under the False Claims Act, pursuant to authorization in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. The announced increases make the FCA’s already draconian penalties even more so, particularly in cases involving individual claims for small dollar amounts. To date, constitutional objections to outsized FCA judgments have experienced little success. But the higher penalty ranges may change the calculus of how courts view constitutional challenges to FCA civil penalties, creating opportunity for defendants finally to gain traction in arguing for constitutional limits to FCA penalties.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Lawyers Jaime Jones, Jennifer Saulino, and Lisa Miller to Speak at the ABA′s 2026 Qui Tam & Civil False Claims and Healthcare Fraud Institute in Washington, D.C.Wednesday, May 27, 2026 – Thursday, May 28, 2026The First Prediction Market Insider Trading Case: SDNY and CFTC Test the Limits of Fraud and Commodities LawMay 13, 2026DOJ’s National Fraud Enforcement Division Launches West Coast Health Care Fraud Strike ForceMay 6, 2026E.D. Pa. Rejects Indefinite Sealing of FCA Extension Materials, Emphasizing Narrow Purpose of SealMay 5, 2026Texas Qui Tam Under Fire: Texas Appellate Dissent Raises Major Constitutional DoubtsMay 4, 2026Clear and Present Danger: DOJ Trade Fraud and Anti-Corruption Priorities Signal Lasting Compliance RiskJuly–August 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
