Law360
Skyrocketing FCA Penalties Ripe For Constitutional Challenges
July 12, 2016
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced dramatically higher civil penalties under the False Claims Act, pursuant to authorization in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. The announced increases make the FCA’s already draconian penalties even more so, particularly in cases involving individual claims for small dollar amounts. To date, constitutional objections to outsized FCA judgments have experienced little success. But the higher penalty ranges may change the calculus of how courts view constitutional challenges to FCA civil penalties, creating opportunity for defendants finally to gain traction in arguing for constitutional limits to FCA penalties.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Strictly Enforcing Rule 9(b), Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FCA Claim Based on Allegedly Defective Medical DevicesMarch 4, 2026Court Grants Motion to Dismiss FCA Claim for Failure Adequately to Plead ScienterMarch 3, 2026TX AG’s Office Continues Aggressive Enforcement Against Healthcare Entities Operating in TexasFebruary 25, 2026DAAG Brenna Jenny Warns Heightened FCA Enforcement Is “The New Normal,” Addresses Enforcement Priorities and PoliciesFebruary 20, 2026DAAG Jenny Reinforces Commitment to FCA Enforcement Premised on “Unlawful DEI”February 20, 2026DOJ Attorneys Underscore Heightened Focus on Trade Fraud During the Annual Qui Tam ConferenceFebruary 19, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
