Harvard Law School Forum
New Ruling on the Fujifilm-Xerox Transaction
October 30, 2018
On October 16, 2018, the New York Appellate Division reversed an injunction that had stalled Fujifilm’s $6.1 billion transaction with Xerox for nearly five months and a completely dismissed all related claims against Fujifilm. The court’s decision in In re Xerox Corporation Consolidated Shareholder Litigation and Deason v. Fujifilm Holdings Corp. reaffirms the longstanding rule that a plaintiff must establish that a majority of the directors on a corporate board is interested or lacks independence with respect to a decision in order to rebut the business judgment rule.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Stockholder Claims as Derivative, Unripe, and UntimelyJuly 14, 2026The Flaw in the Emerging AI Activist PlaybookJuly 6, 2026Bloomberg Ranks Sidley No. 1 for Shareholder Activism in H1 2026 With Record Number of DefensesJuly 1, 2026Sidley Represents Genco Shipping & Trading Limited in Successful Proxy ContestJune 18, 2026Sidley's Kai Liekefett Discusses the Current Activism Climate and Proxy Season With Bloomberg TVJune 4, 2026Sidley Represents lululemon in Proxy Contest Resolution With FounderMay 27, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
