Harvard Law School Forum
New Ruling on the Fujifilm-Xerox Transaction
October 30, 2018
On October 16, 2018, the New York Appellate Division reversed an injunction that had stalled Fujifilm’s $6.1 billion transaction with Xerox for nearly five months and a completely dismissed all related claims against Fujifilm. The court’s decision in In re Xerox Corporation Consolidated Shareholder Litigation and Deason v. Fujifilm Holdings Corp. reaffirms the longstanding rule that a plaintiff must establish that a majority of the directors on a corporate board is interested or lacks independence with respect to a decision in order to rebut the business judgment rule.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley's Kai Liekefett Discusses the Current Activism Climate and Proxy Season With Bloomberg TVJune 4, 2026Sidley Represents lululemon in Proxy Contest Resolution With FounderMay 27, 2026Beyond Persuasion: New Dynamics in Defending Against Shareholder ActivismApril 17, 2026FactSet Ranks Sidley No. 1 for Company Defense in Q1 2026April 15, 2026The Evolution of Activism PreparednessMarch 30, 2026Will the Iran War Become the Poison Pill for Proxy Contests This Season?March 26, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
