Harvard Law School Forum
New Ruling on the Fujifilm-Xerox Transaction
October 30, 2018
On October 16, 2018, the New York Appellate Division reversed an injunction that had stalled Fujifilm’s $6.1 billion transaction with Xerox for nearly five months and a completely dismissed all related claims against Fujifilm. The court’s decision in In re Xerox Corporation Consolidated Shareholder Litigation and Deason v. Fujifilm Holdings Corp. reaffirms the longstanding rule that a plaintiff must establish that a majority of the directors on a corporate board is interested or lacks independence with respect to a decision in order to rebut the business judgment rule.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Will the Iran War Become the Poison Pill for Proxy Contests This Season?March 26, 2026How Iran War Might Reshape Proxy Contests This YearMarch 25, 2026Sidley’s Kai Liekefett Talks Shareholder Activism Trends With Bloomberg TVMarch 24, 2026Sidley’s Kai Liekefett Discusses Geopolitical Headwinds for Shareholder Activism With Bloomberg TVMarch 16, 2026Will the Iran War Become the Poison Pill for Proxy Contests This Season?March 12, 2026Sidley Represents The Brink’s Company in US$6.6 Billion Acquisition of NCR AtleosFebruary 26, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
