Harvard Law School Forum
New Ruling on the Fujifilm-Xerox Transaction
October 30, 2018
On October 16, 2018, the New York Appellate Division reversed an injunction that had stalled Fujifilm’s $6.1 billion transaction with Xerox for nearly five months and a completely dismissed all related claims against Fujifilm. The court’s decision in In re Xerox Corporation Consolidated Shareholder Litigation and Deason v. Fujifilm Holdings Corp. reaffirms the longstanding rule that a plaintiff must establish that a majority of the directors on a corporate board is interested or lacks independence with respect to a decision in order to rebut the business judgment rule.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
How Shareholder Activism Fared in 2025January 6, 2026Bloomberg Ranks Sidley No. 1 for Shareholder Activism Defense for 6th Year in a Row With Record Number of CampaignsJanuary 5, 2026Retail Voting Programs: A Practical Expansion of Shareholder VoiceDecember 15, 2025Kai Liekefett Featured on Investment Banking Leaders PodcastDecember 2, 2025Sidley Represents Denny’s Corporation in Its US$620 Million Take-Private SaleNovember 4, 2025Chambers 2025 Global Practice Guides – Shareholders' Rights & Shareholder ActivismOctober 8, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
