Harvard Law School Forum
New Ruling on the Fujifilm-Xerox Transaction
October 30, 2018
On October 16, 2018, the New York Appellate Division reversed an injunction that had stalled Fujifilm’s $6.1 billion transaction with Xerox for nearly five months and a completely dismissed all related claims against Fujifilm. The court’s decision in In re Xerox Corporation Consolidated Shareholder Litigation and Deason v. Fujifilm Holdings Corp. reaffirms the longstanding rule that a plaintiff must establish that a majority of the directors on a corporate board is interested or lacks independence with respect to a decision in order to rebut the business judgment rule.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Corporate College 2026Wednesday, October 14, 2026 - Thursday, October 15, 2026Holly J. Gregory and Kai H.E. Liekefett Named to 2026 “NACD Directorship 100”September 24, 2026SEC Proposes to Eliminate Rule 14a-8 and Modernize the Proxy ProcessSeptember 23, 2026Delaware Ruling Emphasizes High Bar to Pleading a Control GroupSeptember 11, 2026Sidley Represents MarineMax in Its US$1.5 Billion Sale to Blackstone Infrastructure Portfolio Company, Safe HarborAugust 10, 2026Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Stockholder Claims as Derivative, Unripe, and UntimelyJuly 14, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
