Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Key Takeaways from the European Commission’s New Foreign Subsidies Regulation GuidelinesJanuary 14, 2026U.S. FTC Releases 2026 Thresholds for HSR Act Filings and Raises HSR Filing FeesJanuary 14, 2026Sidley Represents Fitness Industry Veteran Mark Mastrov in Acquisition of 24 Hour FitnessJanuary 12, 2026Sidley Represented Bessemer Investors in Sale of Leonard Valve CompanyJanuary 7, 2026Managing the Surge: The Debate over FERC’s Large-Load InterconnectionsJanuary 5, 2026December Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesDecember 22, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
