Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Advises Shield AI on Acquisition of AechelonMarch 26, 2026Sidley Represented Thompson Street Capital Partners in Its Investment in Karpel Computer SystemsMarch 25, 2026Sidley Lawyers Juan Arteaga, Rosa Morales, and Sarah Scheinman to Speak at the ABA’s 2026 Antitrust Spring MeetingWednesday March 25, 2026 – Thursday March 26, 2026Sidley Recognized in Legal 500 EMEA 2026March 25, 2026Sidley Represents Salt & Stone in Majority Stake Acquisition by AdventMarch 24, 2026Fifth Circuit Holds U.S. FTC’s In-House Adjudication of Deceptive Advertising Claim Unconstitutional Under JarkesyMarch 24, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
