Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Generative AI and Privilege: Practical Lessons from Two Early Decisions and What Comes NextFebruary 27, 2026Sidley Represents The Brink’s Company in US$6.6 Billion Acquisition of NCR AtleosFebruary 26, 2026February Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesFebruary 24, 2026Sidley Represents Thermon in Its US$2.2 Billion Combination With CECO EnvironmentalFebruary 24, 2026How New HSR Thresholds, Fees Could Affect EnforcementFebruary 23, 2026Leading Antitrust Practitioner and Former DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Juan Arteaga, Joins SidleyFebruary 18, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
