Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Contacts

Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
December Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesDecember 22, 2025Sidley Represents Fortidia in Strategic Partnership With BC PartnersDecember 17, 2025Sidley Represents ABM In Its US$275 Million Acquisition of WGNSTARDecember 17, 2025Sidley Helps Secure Complete Victory in Precedent-Setting Antitrust LitigationDecember 17, 2025The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Merger Control 2026December 11, 2025Sidley Elects Partnership Class of 29 and Counsel Class of 15 Across Europe and U.S.December 11, 2025
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory