Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
April Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesApril 23, 2026Sidley Represents Galera Therapeutics in Its Merger With Obsidian Therapeutics and US$350 Million Private Placement FinancingApril 21, 2026UK Competition and Markets Authority Issues £4.2M Fine and Orders £760k of Refunds for Drip PricingApril 20, 2026Sidley Represents Orion Resource Partners in Combination of Sweetwater Royalties With Uranium RoyaltyApril 16, 2026Game Changer: What DOJ’s Antitrust Whistleblower Rewards Program Means for Corporate Compliance ProgramsApril 15, 2026Industrial Accelerator Act: A New Framework for EU (Sustainable) Industrial GrowthApril 9, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
