Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Represents Rigel Pharmaceuticals in Exclusive Global License Agreement with Pfizer and Arvinas for VEPPANUMay 13, 2026Sidley Represents Private Equity at Goldman Sachs Alternatives in the Acquisition of FGI WorldwideMay 12, 2026When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY DecisionMay 11, 2026Sidley Represents Siris Capital in Its US$4.2 Billion Sale of EquinitiMay 5, 2026April Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesApril 23, 2026Sidley Represents Galera Therapeutics in Its Merger With Obsidian Therapeutics and US$350 Million Private Placement FinancingApril 21, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
