Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Bay Area General Counsel RoundtableThursday, September 24, 2026July Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesJuly 23, 2026Sidley Wins Summary Judgment for Chemo Research, S.L. in Trade Secret and Unfair Competition CaseJuly 20, 2026European Commission Signals Targeted Procedural Simplification of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation – Without Weakening EnforcementJuly 16, 2026EU Forced Labor Regulation Moves Toward Implementation: How Companies Should PrepareJuly 7, 2026Sidley Represents South32 in Aluminum Value Chain Sale to Alcoa Valued up to US$5.6 BillionJune 30, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
