Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Lawyers Juan Arteaga, Rosa Morales, and Sarah Scheinman to Speak at the ABA’s 2026 Antitrust Spring MeetingWednesday March 25, 2026 – Thursday March 26, 2026Sidley Ranked in Chambers Europe 2026March 19, 2026Antitrust Crime Enforcement May Escalate Under New ChiefMarch 12, 2026Sidley Advises Verdane in Its Partnership With SmartboxMarch 12, 2026Sidley Represents Siris in Its Agreement to Acquire a Majority Stake in TAKKIONMarch 10, 2026New U.S. DOJ Antitrust Leadership Signals More Criminal Prosecutions and Longer Prison SentencesMarch 6, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
