Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Trend Watch 2026: Hot Topics in California Regulation and LitigationTuesday, February 10, 2026Sidley Secures Appellate Victory for PGA TOUR in Antitrust ChallengeFebruary 6, 2026Sidley Secures Significant Victory in Labor-Related Antitrust Class ActionFebruary 6, 2026Sidley Represents Renesas in Sale of Its Timing Business to SiTimeFebruary 4, 2026Sidley Represents Vivo Capital on Its Acquisition of Dutscher GroupFebruary 4, 2026Sidley Represents RoundTable Healthcare Partners in Its Partnership and Investment in ColorescienceFebruary 2, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
