Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Represents Olin Corporation in Merger of Equals With Huntsman CorporationJune 17, 2026Sidley Represents Wafra in US$1.9 Billion Acquisition of NavitasJune 12, 2026When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY DecisionJune 4, 2026Sidley Elects New Partnership Class of 52June 1, 2026Sidley Represents Passport Global in Its US$425 Million Agreement to Be Acquired by Global-e (Nasdaq: GLBE)May 27, 2026May Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesMay 21, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
