Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
October Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesOctober 22, 2026Revised EU Product Liability Directive: The Long Read — Scope, Key Changes, and Compliance Implications for Businesses (Part 1)October 21, 2026Sidley Represents Fortune Brands in Its Sale of FiberonOctober 15, 2026Corporate College 2026Wednesday, October 14, 2026 - Thursday, October 15, 2026Sidley Represents GE HealthCare in Its US$945 Million Acquisition of SOFIE BiosciencesOctober 7, 2026Sidley Advised Energy Transfer on US$2.625 Billion Acquisition of Vaquero MidstreamOctober 6, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
