Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Bay Area General Counsel RoundtableThursday, September 24, 2026Personalized Pricing: The FTC's Newest Enforcement PrioritySeptember 3, 2026Sidley Represents CDW in Its Acquisition of Data and AI Services Firm LovelyticsSeptember 3, 2026Sidley Represents Apollo Funds in US$4.1 Billion Sale of Kelvion to SLBSeptember 1, 2026Sidley Represents Bearing Distributors, Inc. in Its Investment From Kelso & CompanyAugust 28, 2026August Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesAugust 27, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
