Antitrust
Illinois Brick After Apple v. Pepper
Fall 2019
On May 13, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Apple v. Pepper. The Court had an opportunity to overhaul the Illinois Brick rule, which dictates that only the first or direct purchaser, rather than subsequent or indirect purchasers, may recover damages from an antitrust violator. The Court could have followed the Antitrust Modernization Committee’s suggestion to allow both direct and indirect purchaser suits for the same conduct. The Court also had a chance to explain how longstanding antitrust doctrines apply to technology platforms.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Corporate College 2026Wednesday, October 14, 2026 - Thursday, October 15, 2026Sidley Advises InfraBridge on Sale of 50% Interest in 5.4 GW Power Portfolio to ArcLightSeptember 30, 2026Sidley Represents Electronics for Imaging in Its Combination With Agfa’s Digital Printing Solutions BusinessSeptember 28, 2026Bay Area General Counsel RoundtableThursday, September 24, 2026September Antitrust and Competition Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust IssuesSeptember 24, 2026When the Meeting Minutes and the AI Transcript Don’t Match: Litigation Insights From Delaware ChancerySeptember 17, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
