Just at the cusp of the proxy season, BlackRock has released five engagement priorities for 2020 and identified related key performance indicators (KPIs) that it expects companies to address in corporate disclosures – presumably proxy statements. Also, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) has published a new Climate Voting Policy for investors looking to tailor their engagement practices and/or reconsider their voting decisions based on climate-related practices and disclosures.
These releases from BlackRock and ISS serve to remind public companies that, even while navigating the uncharted COVID-19 waters, attention to shareholder concerns and effective shareholder engagement continues to be important.
BlackRock’s Engagement Priorities and Corresponding KPIs
BlackRock will base certain voting decisions, often vote decisions regarding the election of the non-executive chairman or lead director, on a company’s performance against the newly-prescribed KPIs in the areas of:
- board quality
- environmental risks and opportunities
- corporate strategy and capital allocation
- compensation that promotes long-termism, and
- human capital management.
These priorities resolutely underscore BlackRock’s focus on sustainability efforts. Public companies, and particularly those that list BlackRock among their largest shareholders, should review the new priorities and related KPIs and consider how their underlying practices and related public disclosures compare and how voting may be impacted. They should also consider whether additional disclosures can be made at this stage in the proxy season.
The table below summarizes BlackRock’s new KPIs within each engagement priority and the voting actions BlackRock may take. Companies should review these KPIs and consider them in the context of their broader shareholder engagement strategy, with BlackRock and others, for the 2020 proxy season, and to the extent still possible consider how to address in the proxy statement.
ISS’s New Climate Voting Policy
ISS will also base certain voting decisions on climate-related issues – decisions regarding climate-related shareholder proposals and decisions regarding directors who are considered by ISS to be abdicating their responsibility to appropriately address climate-related risks and/or adequately report sustainability metrics. ISS will use the following factors to evaluate, on an industry-specific basis, a company’s climate-related performance:
- climate norms violations,
- disclosure indicators,
- current performance indicators (including greenhouse gas emissions data),
- future performance indicators drawing from the ISS Carbon Risk Classification, and
- the ISS Carbon Risk Classification.
ISS will use its assessment not only to make vote recommendations but also to provide Climate Awareness Scorecards to institutional investors. Again, public companies should review this new Climate Voting Policy as a yardstick to assess potential impacts on vote outcomes and consider the feasibility of revising their proxy materials to add responsive disclosure.
Note that Sidley has organized a multidisciplinary task force to address the wide range of regulatory, transactional and litigation issues companies face in responding to COVID-19. For more information, and for additional COVID-19 updates, please visit our Resource Center.
Sidley Austin LLP provides this information as a service to clients and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking advice from professional advisers.
Attorney Advertising—Sidley Austin LLP, One South Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60603. +1 312 853 7000. Sidley and Sidley Austin refer to Sidley Austin LLP and affiliated partnerships, as explained at www.sidley.com/disclaimer.
© Sidley Austin LLP