International Trade Committee Newsletter
Injunctive Relief Available to Prevent Assessment of Antidumping Duties at an Unlawful Cash Deposit Rate Established in an Earlier Administrative Review
August 2015
Interested parties involved in U.S. antidumping proceedings may now feel more confident that they need not undertake an administrative review for a particular period of review (“POR”) solely to prevent entries of subject merchandise that took place during that POR from being liquidated at an unlawful cash deposit rate established in an earlier administrative review under the same antidumping order. This conclusion follows from the recent decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) in Navneet Publications (India) Ltd. v. United States.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Ranked in Chambers Greater China Region 2026January 15, 2026Key Takeaways from the European Commission’s New Foreign Subsidies Regulation GuidelinesJanuary 14, 2026Two Sidley International Arbitration Cases Recognized on Law360’s “5 International Arbitration Cases to Watch in 2026”January 13, 2026Sidley Advises on Market-Defining Cross-Border India Matters in 2025January 12, 2026The Comprehensive Outbound Investment National Security Act of 2025 Updates the U.S. Outbound Investment Regime: Key TakeawaysJanuary 8, 2026Treasury Clarifies Outbound Investment Regulations with New FAQs on Publicly Traded Securities and the COINS ActJanuary 8, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
