International Trade Committee Newsletter
Injunctive Relief Available to Prevent Assessment of Antidumping Duties at an Unlawful Cash Deposit Rate Established in an Earlier Administrative Review
August 2015
Interested parties involved in U.S. antidumping proceedings may now feel more confident that they need not undertake an administrative review for a particular period of review (“POR”) solely to prevent entries of subject merchandise that took place during that POR from being liquidated at an unlawful cash deposit rate established in an earlier administrative review under the same antidumping order. This conclusion follows from the recent decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) in Navneet Publications (India) Ltd. v. United States.
得意分野
Suggested News & Insights
Sidley Represents Laza Medical in Its US$160 Million Series B Financing RoundNovember 4, 2026White House Pursues Trade Talks on Robotics and Machinery, Holds Off on TariffsNovember 3, 2026Six Sidley Partners Honored as 2026 “MVPs” by Law360November 2, 2026U.S. Treasury Proposes Sweeping Limits on U.S. Investments in “Countries of Concern”: Biotechnology, Super Intelligence, and MoreOctober 28, 2026Sidley Recognized in Legal 500 Latin America 2027October 28, 2026Hong Kong Arbitration Week 2026 — Broken Dreams and Exit Wounds: Asian Private Capital Disputes RevisitedWednesday, October 21, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
